General ⇒ What is wrong?

[lo2]

What is wrong with this LaTeX text:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
\documentclass[danish]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{ae}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{lastpage}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
\geometry{verbose,letterpaper,bmargin=2cm,tmargin=2cm}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\title{Fysisk Kemi Rapport 1 }
\author{Emil }
\fancyhead[LE,RO]{side \thepage  $\ $/ \pageref{LastPage}--\LaTeX}
\chead{}
\lhead{Emil }
\begin{document}
\begin{center}
\textsc{\huge{Rapport 1}}
\end{center}
\textbf{Spørgsmål 1.}
\\
\\
\textit{Afbild den osmotisk koefficient for $NaCl$, $Na_2SO_4$ og $propan-1-ol$ mod molaliteten. Sammenlign og kommenter de målte og beregnede osmolaliteter for $NaCl (aq)$ for $Na_2SO_4 (aq)$ for $CHCl_2COOH (aq)$ sam for $propan-1-ol (aq)$. Vurder herunder antagelsen om ideale opløsninger. Diskuter specielt årsagen til den observerede forskel mellem $NaCl$ og $Na_2SO_4$ opløsningerne.}
\\
\\
\textbf{Spørgsmål 2.}
\\
\\
\textit{Beregn ved hjælp af den fundne frysepunktssænkning for 0,1 $m$ 1-propanol opløsningen den molære smelteenthalpi og smelteentropi for vand. Kommenter fortegne for $ \Delta H$ og $ \Delta S$.}
\\
\\
Finder $ \Delta H_{H_2O}$ via formlen:
\[
\Delta H_{H_2O}=\frac{R\cdot T^{2}_{s}}{\Delta T_s}\cdot x_B
\]
Sætter så ind for for $0,1 m$ 1-propanol.
\[
\Delta H_{H_2O}=\frac{0,08314 L\cdot bar\cdot K^{-1}\cdot mol^{-1} \cdot (273K)^{2}}{0,1821 K}\cdot \frac{0,1m}{\frac{1000}{18,02g/mol}}=61,32kJ/mol
\] 
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

I get this error:

Code: Select all

1
2
3
4
! Emergency Stop.
<to be read again>
                   \endgroup \set@typeset@protect
l.114 \[
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

What do to?

[meho_r]

I didn't get the same error you mentioned, but you definitely should use utf8 inputenc instead of latin1 if you want to use characters like "ø" or "å" directly.

BTW, you shouldn't use so many line breaks manually. It may be a better approach to set paragraph indentation to 0 and enlarge paragraph skip, e.g.:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
\setlength{\parskip}{12pt plus 4pt minus 2pt}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

Here's a modified version of your code which compiles fine on my machine:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
\documentclass[danish]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}% latin1 wouldn't work with characters like å
\usepackage{geometry}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{ae}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{lastpage}
\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
\geometry{verbose,letterpaper,bmargin=2cm,tmargin=2cm}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\title{Fysisk Kemi Rapport 1 }
\author{Emil }
\fancyhead[LE,RO]{side \thepage $\ $/ \pageref{LastPage}--\LaTeX}
\chead{}
\lhead{Emil }
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}% set paragraph indentation to 0
\setlength{\parskip}{12pt plus 4pt minus 2pt}% enlarge vertical spacing between paragraphs
\begin{document}
\begin{center}
\textsc{\huge{Rapport 1}}
\end{center}
\textbf{Spørgsmål 1.}
\textit{Afbild den osmotisk koefficient for $NaCl$, $Na_2SO_4$ og $propan-1-ol$ mod molaliteten. Sammenlign og kommenter de målte og beregnede osmolaliteter for $NaCl (aq)$ for $Na_2SO_4 (aq)$ for $CHCl_2COOH (aq)$ sam for $propan-1-ol (aq)$. Vurder herunder antagelsen om ideale opløsninger. Diskuter specielt årsagen til den observerede forskel mellem $NaCl$ og $Na_2SO_4$ opløsningerne.}
\textbf{Spørgsmål 2.}
\textit{Beregn ved hjælp af den fundne frysepunktssænkning for 0,1 $m$ 1-propanol opløsningen den molære smelteenthalpi og smelteentropi for vand. Kommenter fortegne for $ \Delta H$ og $ \Delta S$.}
Finder $ \Delta H_{H_2O}$ via formlen:
\[
\Delta H_{H_2O}=\frac{R\cdot T^{2}_{s}}{\Delta T_s}\cdot x_B
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

[lo2]

How do I get that package "\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}"?

I cannot find it in MikTeX package manager.

[meho_r]

It's already included with basic latex installation, just run the code I provided and see if it works. If not, tell us what error did you encounter, is it the same as before or something else.

[lo2]

I get like 58 errors when using that package, whereas I get none when leaving it out.

And thank you for showing me how not to use the \\, I had a pretty good idea that there was a smarter way to do this

[frabjous]

I get like 58 errors when using that package, whereas I get none when leaving it out.

But do the characters appear correctly when leaving it out?

If not, and you get errors when using \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}, you need to figure out what character encoding you're actually using, since it seems to be neither latin1 nor utf8. What editor are you using, and on what operating system?

[localghost]

I get like 58 errors when using that package, whereas I get none when leaving it out. […]

You can use a more general way for input encoding with the selinput package from the oberdiek bundle as shown below. It uses glyph names from a list to encode the character input [1]. This way you don't need to choose an input encoding manually.

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
\documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,danish]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{selinput}
\SelectInputMappings{%
  aring={å},
  ae={æ},
  Euro={€}
}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage[headheight=14pt,includeheadfoot,margin=2cm]{geometry}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\usepackage{lastpage}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}
\usepackage[%
  detect-all,
  exponent-product=\cdot,
  load-configurations=abbreviations,
  output-decimal-marker={,}
]{siunitx}
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
\fancyhf{}
\lhead{Emil}
\rhead{side \thepage\ / \pageref{LastPage}--\LaTeX}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\title{Fysisk Kemi Rapport 1}
\author{Emil}
\begin{document}
  \maketitle
  \section*{Spørgsmål 1.}
    \textsl{Afbild den osmotisk koefficient for \ce{NaCl}, \ce{Na2SO4} og propan-1-ol mod molaliteten. Sammenlign og kommenter de målte og beregnede osmolaliteter for \ce{NaCl (aq)} for \ce{Na2SO4 (aq)} for \ce{CHCl2COOH (aq)} sam for propan-1-ol (aq). Vurder herunder antagelsen om ideale opløsninger. Diskuter specielt årsagen til den observerede forskel mellem \ce{NaCl} og \ce{Na2SO4} opløsningerne.}
 \section*{Spørgsmål 2.}
    \textsl{Beregn ved hjælp af den fundne frysepunktssænkning for \SI{0,1}{\mol} 1-propanol opløsningen den molære smelteenthalpi og smelteentropi for vand. Kommenter fortegne for $\Delta H$ og $\Delta S$.}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

Beside that there is much more to improve in your document (structuring, typesetting of chemical expressions and physical units, …). See code above for some suggestions.

[1] Adobe Glyph List


Thorsten

[lo2]

The æ, ø and å thing really has not been a problem, so guess there is no problem

Well I am sure there is some improvement to be made, I will look into it soon!