Graphics, Figures & TablesHow to properly tell reference of figure?

Information and discussion about graphics, figures & tables in LaTeX documents.
Post Reply
poobear
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:08 am

How to properly tell reference of figure?

Post by poobear »

Hi,

I'm trying to write a scientific report that will look like a review article. I have taken figures from other articles and want to tell the source of the figures in their captions. However, as all scientific articles make their own figures, I havn't been able to see how to do this properly.

I thought of (Fig. ref[x]) where x is the generated number in the bibliography, but I don't know whether this is standard or not.

Has anyone seen articles use figures from other articles and how they cited the figures?

Thanks

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

josephwright
Site Moderator
Posts: 814
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:19 pm

How to properly tell reference of figure?

Post by josephwright »

It is usual to reference figures taken from other source. You might have
Figure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (1).
with a simple citation, or might need to formally state you've reproduced it
Figure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (Reproduced from 1, copyright Original Publisher, 2010).
On the other hand, if you redraw something then
Figure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (adapted from 1).
is more usual.
Joseph Wright
poobear
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:08 am

How to properly tell reference of figure?

Post by poobear »

Thanks!

edit: I guess it was "In case one of the suggested solutions works it is good to say which one" in section 3 that I missed. What I ended up using was the first one
Figure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (1).
Last edited by poobear on Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply