Hi,
I'm trying to write a scientific report that will look like a review article. I have taken figures from other articles and want to tell the source of the figures in their captions. However, as all scientific articles make their own figures, I havn't been able to see how to do this properly.
I thought of (Fig. ref[x]) where x is the generated number in the bibliography, but I don't know whether this is standard or not.
Has anyone seen articles use figures from other articles and how they cited the figures?
Thanks
Graphics, Figures & Tables ⇒ How to properly tell reference of figure?
NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

-
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:19 pm
How to properly tell reference of figure?
It is usual to reference figures taken from other source. You might have
with a simple citation, or might need to formally state you've reproduced itFigure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (1).
On the other hand, if you redraw something thenFigure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (Reproduced from 1, copyright Original Publisher, 2010).
is more usual.Figure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (adapted from 1).
Joseph Wright
How to properly tell reference of figure?
Thanks!
edit: I guess it was "In case one of the suggested solutions works it is good to say which one" in section 3 that I missed. What I ended up using was the first one
edit: I guess it was "In case one of the suggested solutions works it is good to say which one" in section 3 that I missed. What I ended up using was the first one
Figure X. Diagram of the design of YYY (1).
Last edited by poobear on Sun Feb 13, 2011 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.