Hi,
I'm using chicago.bst for my bibliographystyle, and the way multiple authors are listed comes out wrong. An example of an entry is:
@ARTICLE{boxtiao:1962,
author = "G. ~E. ~P. Box and G. ~C. Tiao ",
title = "A further look at robustness via Bayes theorem",
journal="Biometrika",
year="1962",
volume="49",
pages="419--432"}
I want to see the authors listed as:
Box, G. E. P. and Tiao, G. C.
but when I bibtex my file, the references come out as:
Box, G. E. P. and G. C. Tiao
I tried putting the last names before the initials in my *.bib file but it doesn't fix the problem. Anyone have any idea what I can do, or why this is happening?
Thanks!
Ayesha
General ⇒ author name formatting in chcago.bst
Learn LaTeX easily with newest books:
The LaTeX Beginner's Guide: 2nd edition and perfect for students writing a thesis
The LaTeX Cookbook: 2nd edition full of practical examples for mathematics, physics, chemistry, and more
LaTeX Graphics with TikZ: the first book about TikZ for perfect drawings in your LaTeX thesis
author name formatting in chcago.bst
Do you have to use chicago? I had a look at the example of this style on
"http://www.cs.stir.ac.uk/~kjt/software/latex/showbst.html" ..Personally I don't like how it prints out the citation in the text.
I prefer natbib.sty , using plainnat.bst
It gives out something like this in the text
\citep produces [Box and Tiao, 1962]
\citet produces Box and Tiao [1962]
and writes it out in the reference as
G. E. P. Box and G. C. Tiao. A further look at robustness via bayes theorem. Biometrika, 49:419{432, 1962.
It is not exactly what you want , but it is better than chicago in my opinion. Hope it helps.
"http://www.cs.stir.ac.uk/~kjt/software/latex/showbst.html" ..Personally I don't like how it prints out the citation in the text.
I prefer natbib.sty , using plainnat.bst
It gives out something like this in the text
\citep produces [Box and Tiao, 1962]
\citet produces Box and Tiao [1962]
and writes it out in the reference as
G. E. P. Box and G. C. Tiao. A further look at robustness via bayes theorem. Biometrika, 49:419{432, 1962.
It is not exactly what you want , but it is better than chicago in my opinion. Hope it helps.