All the bibtex styles I've seen use a "compressed" format (as how it's defined in van Leunen's "Handbook for Scholars"); that is, there are no line breaks between items:
A. Name, The title of my article, Some Journal 10(11), 2007.
I would like an "open" format, with line breaks, more like this:
A. Name.
The title of my article.
Some Journal 10(11), 2007.
Are there any ready-made bibstyles that will produce such output?
BibTeX, biblatex and biber ⇒ Open vs compressed format in references
Learn LaTeX easily with newest books:
The LaTeX Beginner's Guide: 2nd edition and perfect for students writing a thesis
The LaTeX Cookbook: 2nd edition full of practical examples for mathematics, physics, chemistry, and more
LaTeX Graphics with TikZ: the first book about TikZ for perfect drawings in your LaTeX thesis
-
josephwright
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 2:19 pm
Re: Open vs compressed format in references
Probably easiest to use biblatex. It uses conceptual rather than literal breaks between bibliography "units", so it's easy to alter what happens between each unit.
Joseph Wright
Open vs compressed format in references
This should even be possible with any standard bibliography style and the openbib class option.
-
jazzgossen
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 3:19 pm
Re: Open vs compressed format in references
Great, thanks!