General ⇒ \newcommand. Cannot create macros called \x1 and \x2

[gustaf4711]

I try to create two simple macros named \x1 and \x2 to save typing time. One try uses the standard \newcommand and the other the TeX \def but both fails. Using may questions, I am unable to get some help from Google. Unfortunately The TeXBook's chapter 20---with all those bends and double-bends---is too difficult for me to follow.

Below please find the two cases which both fail. The error message is included at the beginning as a LaTeX comment.

Hopefully someone could help me out of this trouble.

Regards,
ChG

First try:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
%
% ! LaTeX Error: \mathbf allowed only in math mode.
% ...
% l.6  \newcommand{\x1}{\mathbf{x}_1}
%
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}
 \newcommand{\x1}{\mathbf{x}_1}
 \newcommand{\x2}{\mathbf{x}_2}
\begin{displaymath}
  \x1+\x2
\end{displaymath}
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

Second try:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
% ! Use of \x doesn't match its definition.
% l.9   \x1
%         +\x2
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
 \def\x1{\mathbf{x}_1}
 \def\x2{\mathbf{x}_2}
\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{displaymath}
  \x1+\x2
\end{displaymath}
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

[cgnieder]

command names cannot have digits in them. Command names may only consist of what (La)TeX regards as “letters”, see the TeX FAQ: https://texfaq.org/FAQ-linmacnames

[gustaf4711]

Thank you very much to point out that a newcommand's comm_name is made from letters only.

A bit ashamed I of course found it clearly said in my book by Kopka and Daly. TeX's error-messages did not give me any clear indication of what was the nature of my error, so I did not consult the book.

The \x1 and the \x2 make the manuscript much easier to read and therefore I keep them. An editor macro then easily turns the readable tex-file into a copy-file with, acceptable \xa and \xb .

ChG

[Ijon Tichy]

In the shown case, you can define a command with one argument:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\newcommand*{\x}[1]{\mathbf{x}_{#1}}
\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{displaymath}
  \x1+\x2+\x{12}
\end{displaymath}
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

And please note: Several one letter macros are already defines. To avoid broken code, you should always use \newcommand or \NewDocumentCommand. The second one needs a new LaTeX kernel or package xparse. See ltnews for more information.