General ⇒ Split to a list while passing through \keys_define

[thanhph111]

Hi, I'm new to LaTex3. I'm only familiar with the topmost layers like xparse right now but not so close to expl3, I'm trying to dig deeper.

Below is my MWE, using key-value arguments with the second one is a list of items separated by commas. The list is printed normally when I passed it directly to the \DrawList command, which has a \SplitList processor and a \ProcessList command. However, if the text is parsed by the \keys_define before being splitted, it seems to ignore the comma and the processor cannot split it at all.

How can I make it print like the \DrawList command? It's also great if anyone has a better alternative to make the interface easier. Thank you all.

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xparse}
\ExplSyntaxOn
\NewDocumentCommand\DrawList{>{\SplitList{,}}m}{
    \begin{itemize}
        \ProcessList{#1}{\item}
    \end{itemize}
}
\keys_define:nn {module_name}{
    ,1 .tl_set:N  = \__title
    ,2 .tl_set:N  = \__list
}
\NewDocumentCommand \TitleAndList { O{} }{
    \group_begin:
    \keys_set:nn {module_name}{#1}
    \tl_if_empty:NF {\__title}{%
        \__title :\par
    }
    \tl_if_empty:NF {\__list}{%
        \DrawList{\__list}
    }
    \group_end:
}
\ExplSyntaxOff
\begin{document}
\DrawList{{First item, with a comma}, {Second item}}
---
\TitleAndList[
    1=Include,
    2={{First item, with a comma}, {Second item}}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

No luck with lower-layer code:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
\seq_new:N \list_sequence
\NewDocumentCommand\DrawList{m}{
    \seq_set_split:Nnn \list_sequence{,}{#1}
    \begin{itemize}
        \seq_map_function:NN \list_sequence \item
    \end{itemize}
}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

I've also posted the question here so you can read other answers.

[Ijon Tichy]

\DrawList does not expand the argument before splitting it. So in your case it does never see {First item, with a comma}, {Second item} but always \__list, which does not contain a comma. You need at least one step of expansion of \__list so see the comma, e.g.:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xparse}
\ExplSyntaxOn
\NewDocumentCommand\DrawList{>{\SplitList{,}}m}{
    \begin{itemize}
        \ProcessList{#1}{\item}
    \end{itemize}
}
\keys_define:nn {module_name}{
    ,1 .tl_set:N  = \__title
    ,2 .tl_set:N  = \__list
}
\NewDocumentCommand \TitleAndList { O{} }{
    \group_begin:
    \keys_set:nn {module_name}{#1}
    \tl_if_empty:NF {\__title}{%
        \__title :\par
    }
    \tl_if_empty:NF {\__list}{%
        \exp_after:wN \DrawList \exp_after:wN {\__list}
    }
    \group_end:
}
\ExplSyntaxOff
\begin{document}
\DrawList{{First item, with a comma}, {Second item}}
---
\TitleAndList[
    1=Include,
    2={{First item, with a comma}, {Second item}}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

There are other expansion functions like all the \exp_args:… that would be useful here. For example

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
\NewDocumentCommand \TitleAndList { O{} }{
    \group_begin:
    \keys_set:nn {module_name}{#1}
    \tl_if_empty:NF {\__title}{%
        \__title :\par
    }
    \tl_if_empty:NF {\__list}{%
        \exp_args:No \DrawList{\__list}
    }
    \group_end:
}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

would be an optimized definition. Maybe \exp_args:No should also be added before \tl_if_empty:NF {\__list}.

[Ijon Tichy]

Please always ever set links to crossposts. This can save some precious time, if the question, e.g., on TeX.SX is already completely answered. It is not that helpers have endless time. It is therefore very inconsiderate to scatter questions over several forums and to keep helpers everywhere busy with them even when the questions have already been answered elsewhere.

[thanhph111]

I'm sorry for that, just included my crosspost, I should have waited a while before posting elsewhere.
I also learned new approach in your answer so I will mark it accepted. Thank you for your detailed answer!