GeneralSetting leading...are my assumptions right or wrong?

LaTeX specific issues not fitting into one of the other forums of this category.
Post Reply
Noraft
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:50 pm

Setting leading...are my assumptions right or wrong?

Post by Noraft »

I'd like to typeset a book in Palatino 10, with 12 point leading. Normally, my only default options are single, 1.5, and double spacing.

I know that I can set \linespread{factor} to {1.3} (1.5 spacing) or {1.6} (double spacing). However, if 1.3 = space and a half and 1.6 = double spacing, does that mean that I can assume .1 is a sixth of a line? So if I'm using Palatino 10, a factor of .1 is 1.67 points? if so, I could approximate 10/12 leading with \linespread{1.12}

Is this correct? Or am I starting with a faulty assumption?

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

Learn LaTeX easily with newest books:

The LaTeX Beginner's Guide: 2nd edition and perfect for students writing a thesis

The LaTeX Cookbook: 2nd edition full of practical examples for mathematics, physics, chemistry, and more

LaTeX Graphics with TikZ: the first book about TikZ for perfect drawings in your LaTeX thesis

phi
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:10 pm

Setting leading...are my assumptions right or wrong?

Post by phi »

Do you really want 12 pt leading? This would be very much. Or do you rather want 12 pt as baseline skip (distance between consecutive baselines)? This is already the default. I think that you cannot set the leading directly, as it depends on the properties of the selected font. For example, if you have a horizontal box (line), then the leading would be the baseline skip minus the height minus the depth of the box. \linespread multiplies the baseline skip by the argument number, so 12 pt × 1.3 = 15.6 pt ≈ 15 = 1.5 × 10 pt and 12 pt × 1.6 = 19.2 pt ≈ 20 = 2.0 × 10 pt.
Post Reply