Text Formattingttfont justification

Information and discussion about LaTeX's general text formatting features (e.g. bold, italic, enumerations, ...)
Post Reply
jsbibra
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:25 pm

ttfont justification

Post by jsbibra »

a solution was presented for Justification with tt font as given on the following page
http://texblog.net/latex-archive/plaint ... iter-font/
however after compilation though the justification is achieved however if

Code: Select all

\Latex
is used it gives the following output which is different from the original
can this be improved?
ScreenClip.png
ScreenClip.png (1.02 KiB) Viewed 2513 times

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

And: Currently, Packt sells ebooks for $4.99 each if you buy 5 of their over 1000 ebooks. If you choose only a single one, $9.99. How about combining 3 LaTeX books with Python, gnuplot, mathplotlib, Matlab, ChatGPT or other AI books? Epub and PDF. Bundle (3 books, add more for higher discount): https://packt.link/MDH5p

Ijon Tichy
Posts: 640
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2018 10:12 am

ttfont justification

Post by Ijon Tichy »

If you don't want LaTeX to be in \ttfamily, just switch the font for the acronym, e.g., \textrm{\LaTeX}.

BTW: You should never justify a monospaced font. I is nonsense and ugly and extremely bad typography. Either use ragged left text or don't use a monospaced font. My suggestion would be to use \RaggedRight with package ragged2e if I really, really have to use a monospaced font.
Sorry, but I can no longer participate here as the administrator is trampling on my wishes on one of his other platforms. :cry:
jsbibra
Posts: 17
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 2:25 pm

ttfont justification

Post by jsbibra »

Code: Select all

\begin{enumerate}
		\RaggedRight
\item Reference HQ DGQA/L-2 L/No 78846/APAR/Civ Offr/DGQA/L-2 dt 09 Oct 2019.\\ 
\item It is submitted that the undersigned was not the Reporting Authority in respect of Shri James Peter V, PScO, for the period 01 Apr 2017 to 31 Mar 2018.\\
\item In this connection the following CQA(AVL) DO Part I Orders are relevant
\begin{enumerate}
\item DO Part I Order S No 17 dt 05 Apr 2016, Para 34, vide which Shri Peter was posted to ``T'' Wing / CQA(AVL)\footnote{copy enclosed}
\item DO Part I Order S No 34 dt 08 Jun 2016, Para 63, vide which the undersigned was posted out from ``T'' Wing to ``O'' Wing / CQA(AVL)\footnote{copy enclosed}
\item The total overlap of the undersigned with Sh Peter was from 05 Apr 2016 to 08 Jun 2016, and did not in any case cover the period as mentioned in the APAR received vide ibid letter at reference
\item DGQA/Adm-6 letters mentioned in Para 1 of reference letter have not been found enclosed
\end{enumerate}
\item Accordingly, APAR in respect of the offr is returned herewith for your further necessary disposal please.\\ [.1cm]

\end{enumerate}
is this the correct way to use the package
Post Reply