MiKTeX and proTeXtcomplete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Information and discussion about MikTeX distribution for Windows and the related proTeXt: Installing, updating, configuring
ghostanime2001
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 9:41 am

complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by ghostanime2001 »

I am using Windows 7 x64 SP1 and miktex 2.9. Whenever I install miktex 2.9 basic and then add all packages using package manager after, I am always running to major problems compiling my code with xelatex. However, when I install complete miktex from installation until the end, and compile my code all pstricks graphics show perfectly. What is going on ? How come when I install basic miktex to finish the install and then later install all packages and re-run my code using xelatex, I always run into difficulty compiling ? Is this a bug ?

Code: Select all

\documentclass{article} 
\usepackage{pstricks}
\begin{document}    
\begin{pspicture}(-0.5,0)(2.5,1)
\psdots(0,0)(2,0)(1,1)
\end{pspicture}
\end{document}
Last edited by ghostanime2001 on Tue Mar 05, 2013 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

User avatar
localghost
Site Moderator
Posts: 9202
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:06 pm

complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by localghost »

Just for information to other users for awareness of possibly already existing solutions. The question has also been posted to {TeX} SX. Please read what our administrator thinks about that.

You should provide some useful information like warnings or error messages from the log file. Otherwise this question is too localized and the discussion will be academic.
User avatar
Stefan Kottwitz
Site Admin
Posts: 10320
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm

Re: complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by Stefan Kottwitz »

The example works fine also with TeX Live.

I agree, you should post the error messages, if you remember. So we could see which packages are possibly missing in one way of installation, if there's a difference.

For now, it still seems possible that the way of finishing the basic installation wasn't complete, such as not synchronizing with the repository or using a different or incomplete or outdated repository.

Stefan
LaTeX.org admin
ghostanime2001
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 9:41 am

Re: complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by ghostanime2001 »

The error file is attached. Also, what does synchronizing with the repository actually do? The questions that were posted in TeX.SX were for Linux distributions and the ones I found for MiKTeX needed command line parameters.
Attachments
test.log
(6.52 KiB) Downloaded 576 times
Last edited by localghost on Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Complete Files are better uploaded as attachment to the forum server instead of being posted as code.
User avatar
Stefan Kottwitz
Site Admin
Posts: 10320
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm

complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by Stefan Kottwitz »

ghostanime2001 wrote:The log file is attached.
Is this from the working compiler run, or from the earlier not working example run?
ghostanime2001 wrote: Also, what does synchronizing with the repository actually do? The questions that were posted in TeX.SX were for Linux distributions and the ones I found for MiKTeX needed command line parameters.
I guess you mean

Code: Select all

mpm --update-db
which syncs the local package database with the online repository package database. It's useful if package names would change, for example, or if there are new packages. I don't know if there's a button in the MiKTeX package manager, I don't have it installed to look at it, since I use TeX Live.

Stefan
LaTeX.org admin
ghostanime2001
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 9:41 am

Re: complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by ghostanime2001 »

I have never used Linux in my life so I can't understand what command lines do but the error log is from the code that ran successfully but I did not see any graphics being printed. I changed my code to include \psellipse but I didn't see the graphic. Miktex does have synchronize button. Do I need to refresh FNDB and update format after I synchronize ?
User avatar
Stefan Kottwitz
Site Admin
Posts: 10320
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm

complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by Stefan Kottwitz »

ghostanime2001 wrote:Do I need to refresh FNDB and update format after I synchronize ?
No, those are all different things. Refresh FNDB means just refreshing the local package database if the local information has been changed manually, i.e. not by the package manager. Rebuilding the format files is rarely nessesary for the user.

Stefan
LaTeX.org admin
ghostanime2001
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 9:41 am

Re: complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by ghostanime2001 »

so what's the next step ?
User avatar
Stefan Kottwitz
Site Admin
Posts: 10320
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm

Re: complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by Stefan Kottwitz »

Perhaps give TeX Live a try.

Stefan
LaTeX.org admin
ghostanime2001
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 9:41 am

Re: complete vs. basic miktex - xelatex

Post by ghostanime2001 »

oh man i hope texworks works with tex live the names sound like they are made for each other
Post Reply