Hi,
gmedina!
I really can't understand footnotes! I see that there is very bad friendship between hyperref and footnote's packages, and I don't know how to choose any compatible set.
— Yesterday I've got zero number, but today I can't get this result again — what was happened?
— Yesterday there were problems with long footnotes (see my post
here), but today they somehow dissapear... I have tried bigfoot or manyfoot package, but now I use no one:
- \usepackage{manyfoot} — breaks hyperlinks at paragraph footnotemark (they go on title page);
\usepackage{bigfoot} — breaks hyperlinks at all footnotemarks (they go on title page);
\usepackage{bigfoot} with \usepackage{tabularx} — just removes all footnotemark hyperlinks;
— For the perpage numeration, which also I need, there are troubles, too:
- \usepackage{perpage} gives no effect;
\usepackage{footnpag} resets the numeration, but removes hyperlinks at chapter/paragraph footnotemarks;
\usepackage[perpage]{manyfoot} don't reset numeration;
======================================
About your code. I need exactly "
\footnotemark...\footnotetext", nor simple "
\footnote" — I want also to format the font of footnotemark. May be, it can be redefined in preambula? Nevertheless, footmisc package works (I mean hyperlink behavior) with both variants
in minimal test examle, but
not in my document!.. In my document only your simple variant gives right hyperlink, "
\footnotemark...\footnotetext don't. I can't found what is the reason of that, so, I attach my file (in LyX format and in LaTeX imported from LyX, without images).
* If nothing else, it is good, that "
[perpage]" option works correctly with "
{footmisc}" ("
\usepackage[stable,perpage]{footmisc}").
Last question is about quotes << >>/«». They provided by "
\usepackage[russian]{babel}" and "
\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}", as I know, and can be defined with another code in some classes. So, I don't know now how to resolve this, too...
______________________________________________
* See section "3.3. Модели «объект–действие» и «действие–объект»" and paragraph "Двойная «дискликсия»" (pp. 70 and 87 in PDF).
