General ⇒ Bibliography Style

[pharwarlay]

I am writing an M.Sc thesis. I have used LaTeX for the preparation of the thesis. But after my oral defense, when I try to do the corrections, the bibliography style gave a different format. I did not alter the bibliography style I used initial. My preamble and bibliography style are given below:

Code: Select all

\documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{report}
\usepackage{t1enc}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage[numbers,sort&compress,authoryear]{natbib}
\usepackage{indentfirst}
%\usepackage{subeqn}
%\usepackage{varioref,hyperref}
%\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\addcontentsline{toc}{subsection}{References}
\bibliographystyle{apalike}
%\bibliographystyle{astron}
%\bibliographystyle{harvard}
%\bibliographystyle{plain} %% plain.bst
%\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
%\bibliographystyle{apsrev}
%\bibliographystyle{bbs}
%\bibliographystyle{siam}
%\bibliographystyle{chicago}
\bibliography{references}

Do I need to install 'apalike' package or what really is the problem. Could anyone be kind enough to assist me urgently. I have an ultimatum to meet.

The output of reference listing is now numbered and there are no indentation on the lines after the first. I actually want a style like this:

Ying, Q., Mysliwiec, M. and Kleeman, M. J. (2004) Source apportionment of visibility impairment using a three-dimensional source-oriented air quality model. Environmental Science and Technology, 38: 1089-1101.

Ying, Q. and Kleeman, M.J. (2006) Source contributions to the regional distribution of secondary particulate matter in California. Atmospheric Environment, 40: 736-752.

Yuanxun, Z., Yuanmao, Z., Yingsong, W., Delu, L., Aiguo, L., Yan, L., Guilin, Z., Yifei, Z. and Zuci, S. (2006) PIXE Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 Particulate Matter Collected during the Winter Season in Shanghai City. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 267: 497–499.

But the lines after the first will be indented.

[meho_r]

I'm not sure if I'd be able to help, but a little more infos and a working example would be helpful. I still do not understand what the problem is, and in which manner the output changed (what exactly changed and comparing to what?)

[localghost]

It would be very kind if you mention when doing a crossposting [1]*. This is only fair because it prevents others from double efforts and waste of time.


* According to the rules you are obliged to do so.

[1] {TeX} SX – 'Apalike' bibliography style not responding correctly
[2] {TeX} SX – bibliography style


Best regards and welcome to the board
Thorsten