Page Layout ⇒ Remove dot after number in footnotes

[richirik]

Dear forum members.
How can I remove the dot after the numbers in footnotes? I use the footmisc package.
kind regards
richirik

[localghost]

Somehow I can't comprehend the problem.

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper,english]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage[bottom,flushmargin,hang,multiple]{footmisc}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\begin{document}
  \blindtext\footnote{\blindtext}
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

Please give a counterexample [1].

[1] View topic: Avoidable mistakes


Best regards and welcome to the board
Thorsten

[richirik]

Hi Thorsten,
I try to give you a minimal counterexample, which produces the point in the numbering. I think it has something to do with the fancyhdr package.

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
\documentclass[a4paper,fontsize=10pt,twoside,openright,chapterpre fix=true,numbers=noendperiod,final]
{scrbook}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[bottom,flushmargin,hang,multiple,norule]{footmisc}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage[printonlyused]{acronym}
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhfoffset{0in}
\fancyfoot{}
\fancyfoot[OR]{\thepage}
\fancyfoot[EL]{\thepage}
\setlength{\footnotesep}{0.2cm}
\deffootnote{0.4cm}{0em}{\thefootnotemark.~}
\setkomafont{disposition}{\normalfont} 
\begin{document}
  \blindtext\footnote{\blindtext}
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

Thanks for your help and I will try to follow the rules if the problem is solved.
kind regards
Richirik

[localghost]

Au contraire. It's a redefinition of the footnote mark. Just drop this line.

Code: Select all

1
\deffootnote{0.4cm}{0em}{\thefootnotemark.~}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

You should only use code from which you know what it does.

[richirik]

Yes! the line was supposed to make the superscript of the footnote number a normal number. Therefore I let the line, but removed the point in the lin:

Code: Select all

1
\deffootnote{0.4cm}{0em}{\thefootnotemark~}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

No it works as I wanted it. I know that I should only insert codes I understand, but sometimes it is just faster to work trial and error.
kind regards
richirik