I've been using LaTeX for about two weeks and this is my first post on the forum. I'd like to begin by thanking in advance anyone who reads this for the time they spend doing so, I'm very grateful.
I know that the matter of alignment in matrices has been dealt with already in a number of other threads and I've read these without being able to solve my problem so I hope that my post won't be considered a waste of anyone's time. In previous posts the problem of column alignment in matrices appears to have been solved by either:
(A) Suggesting the use of an alignment or array environment instead of a matrix environment that already allows for column alignment arguments.
(B) A new definition of the matrix environment to include alignment possibilities.
I'm not sure if the alternative environments of the (A) type solution would allow for the use of the environment as a node map for the subsequent flowchart and I'm afraid that the type (B) solutions on the forum are specific to other people's problems and I don't understand how one might redefine an environment to solve my difficulty.
My problem is tidying up the alignment of the following flowchart:
Code: Select all
\documentclass[a5paper,twoside]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,pst-all,geometry,fancyhdr}
\begin{document}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\fancyhf{}
\fancyhead[CO]{The Article Name}
\fancyhead[CE]{The Journal Name}
\fancyfoot[CO,CE]{\thepage}
\parindent=0pt
\begin{psmatrix}[colsep=-2cm,rowsep=0.5cm]
& \ensuremath{~~(10) \rotateright{\rotateright{A}}w\rotateright{\rotateright{A}}y\neg(Gywa@)} \\ %1
& \ensuremath{~~(11) Eao} \\ %2
& \ensuremath{~~(12) \rotateright{\rotateright{A}}x \rotateright{\rotateright{A}} w\rotateright{\rotateright{A}}v(Exw\wedge \neg Exv\rightarrow Gxwxv)} \\ %3
& \ensuremath{ \neg (13) \neg Ea@ \vee Gbma@} \\ %line 4
\ensuremath{Ea@}&&\ensuremath{Gbma@}\\ %line 5
\ensuremath{(12) (Ean\wedge\neg Ea@ ) \rightarrow Gana@}&&\ensuremath{(10) \frac{\displaystyle \neg Gbma@}{\displaystyle X}} \\ %line 6
\ensuremath{Gana@}&&\ensuremath{\neg (Ean\wedge \neg Ea@)} \\ %line 7
\ensuremath{(10) \frac{\displaystyle \neg Gbma@}{\displaystyle X}} & \ensuremath{\neg Ean} & \ensuremath{\frac{\displaystyle Ea@}{\displaystyle X}} \\ %line 8
& \ensuremath{(12) (Ean\wedge \neg Ea@ ) \rightarrow Gana@} \\ %line 9
\ensuremath{Gaoa} & & \ensuremath{\neg(Ean \wedge \neg Ea@)} \\ %line 10
\ensuremath{(10) \frac{\displaystyle \neg Gbma@}{\displaystyle X}} & \ensuremath{\neg Eao} & \ensuremath{\frac{\displaystyle Ea@}{\displaystyle X}} \\ %line 11
& \ensuremath{\frac{\displaystyle Eao}{\displaystyle X}} \\ %12
\end{psmatrix}
\psset{nodesep=3pt,arrows=-}
\ncline{4,2}{5,1}\ncline{4,2}{5,3} %line 4->5
\ncline{5,1}{6,1}\ncline{5,3}{6,3} %line 5->6
\ncline{6,1}{7,1}\ncline{6,1}{7,3} %line 6-7
\ncline{7,1}{8,1}\ncline{7,3}{8,2}\ncline{7,3}{8,3} %line 7->8
\ncline{8,2}{9,2} %line 8->9
\ncline{9,2}{10,1}\ncline{9,2}{10,3}%9->10
\ncline{10,1}{11,1}\ncline{10,3}{11,2}\ncline{10,3}{11,3} %10->11
\ncline{11,2}{12,2} %11->12
\end{document}
Problem (2): As the third column of the matrix contains no long statements it appears slightly crushed up against the second column. Is it possible to even the distance between the 2nd column and the 1st and 3rd columns or adjust the column separation for these columns separately without the whole thing falling off the right side of the page again?
Problem (3): The capital 'x' fraction denominator appears to contact the dividing line of the fraction, can a tiny bit of extra space be placed between the top of the 'x' and this line?
Many thanks for any time that you have spent considering this post!
