Graphics, Figures & Tables ⇒ TikZ: alignment of horizontal axis labels

[johnjamessmith0]

Consider a horizontal axis with labels at certain points:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
  \draw (0,0) -- (5,0);
  \node [below] at (1,0) {$a$};
  \node [below] at (2,0) {$b$};
  \node [below] at (3,0) {$g$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\bigskip
\bigskip
\begin{tikzpicture}
  \draw (0,0) -- (5,0);
  \node [below] at (1,0) {\vphantom{$abg$}$a$};
  \node [below] at (2,0) {\vphantom{$abg$}$b$};
  \node [below] at (3,0) {\vphantom{$abg$}$g$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

The alignment in the first tikzpicture is decidedly suboptimal. But to fix it, the best code I've come up with that of the second tikzpicture above. Is there an easier way?

Thanks.

[shadgrind]

I don't know if this is easier, but here's my way of doing it:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
  \draw[anchor=base] (0,0) -- (5,0)
   node[shift={(0,-0.4)},pos=0.2] {$a$}
   node[shift={(0,-0.4)},pos=0.4] {$b$}
   node[shift={(0,-0.4)},pos=0.6] {$g$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

[johnjamessmith0]

That method seems to require some inconvenient precomputation for at least two things: the vertical alignment of the labels and their horizontal alignment. Which means one can't easily remove or add labels that have wacky vertical dimensions, like f_1^2, for example. I hadn't seen that syntax before though, and I'll probably find it useful elsewhere, so thanks.

[shadgrind]

I prefer using relative positioning, but you could replace that with absolute positioning if you want:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
\begin{tikzpicture}
  \draw[anchor=base] (0,0) -- (5,0)
   node[shift={(0,-0.4)}] at (1,0) {$a$}
   node[shift={(0,-0.4)}] at (2,0) {$b$}
   node[shift={(0,-0.4)}] at (3,0) {$g$};
\end{tikzpicture}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

As for the fixed downward vertical shift, you're going to have to do something like that no matter what if you want the labels aligned. The key part is using the anchor=base option. After that, the vertical shift is simple.