Comments & Wishes ⇒ bibliography style

[deyz_18]

ieee.png (146.48 KiB) Viewed 48714 times

plain.png (176.41 KiB) Viewed 48714 times

As an observation of a new user of texmaker, in the output, using a biber, the difference of bibstyle : plain and ieee is not that precise. What is the easy way to observe their defference(s)?

[Johannes_B]

You have to clear all the auxiliary files and start over the complete compilation chain in order to see changes to the bibliography.

[deyz_18]

I already do that many times.
Based on your observation(s), can you differentiate the two?

[Johannes_B]

Can you uload the code, so that we can compile on our own?

[deyz_18]

sure

[Johannes_B]

Sorry, one document is an article in two-column mode and none of the references are in the database, the other is a report in one column mode that uses biblatex (and the incompatible cite package, you get an error) with subdivided bibliographies. Both are using an ieee style. I don't know what should be compared here??

[deyz_18]

you just have to change the bibstyle in activity 1 (make it plain).

[Johannes_B]

I now corrected the name of the database in the example, used a proper bst name and compared with plain. And i see differences.

[deyz_18]

Thank you!