MakeIndex, Nomenclature, Glossaries and Acronyms ⇒ Index of Subjects and Symbols

[melekzedek]

Hello TeXnians,

I'm writing a book and need to make a subject index and a symbol index similar to the following one

Screen Shot 2013-11-20 at 20.28.30.png (54.64 KiB) Viewed 16599 times

The problem is that I tried to find some package to do this and I couldn't find. I'm using multind, but it is to old and the symbol index is very bad.

Can anyone help me with a minimal working example?

thank you in advance

[localghost]

What about imakeidx or splitindex? Both support multiple indexes.


Thorsten

[melekzedek]

I tried to read the package documentation of both packags, but I was not able to find what I was looking for. I will give another look carefuly.

Thanks for the anwser

[localghost]

[…] I will give another look carefuly. […]

Good decision. Take your time to read the manual for the package of your choice. The examples will give you a good starting point.

[melekzedek]

I think what I want is not a feature in any package. Therefore it is necessary to tweak with some existing packages. I'll try to do the following, to obtain the end result that I want in the symbol index (if anyone knows how to do each step, please let me know):

• I need to define multiple indexes, each based on the specific topic (e.g. Operators, Set theory, etc), I guess makeindex is sufficient for this purpose.
• I need to print all the indexes in a continuous way, switching off the new page in each print index.

If I obtain the end result, I will let you know.

Thanks for the quick answer.

[localghost]

The proposed packages definitely support multiple indexes. MakeIndex alone does not.

[nlct]

You ought to mention when you crosspost. I've posted a reply to your question on TeX on StackExchange:

You can use glossaries to do this. I assume you either want to sort your symbols according to definition or to usage since symbols are difficult to sort alphabetically (and your sample isn't alphabetically sorted). With glossaries you can use the package option sort=def to sort in order of definition or sort=use to sort according to usage. In the example below, I've used sort=def (change \setglossarystyle to \glossarystyle if you are using a version of glossaries prior to version 4.0):

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage[nomain,section,sort=def]{glossaries}
\usepackage{glossary-mcols}
% (Pre glossaries v4.0 requires \glossarystyle rather than
% \setglossarystyle)
\setglossarystyle{mcolindex}
\renewcommand{\glspostdescription}{\dotfill}
\newglossary[op-glg]{operators}{op-gls}{op-glo}{Operators}
\newglossary[cn-glg]{constants}{cn-gls}{cn-glo}{Constants}
\makeglossaries
% Define a command to define operators
% Syntax: \newoperator[options]{label}{operator symbol}
\newcommand*{\newoperator}[3][]{%
  \newglossaryentry{#2}{type=operators,%
    name={$#3$},text={#3},description={},#1}%
}
% Similarly for constants
\newcommand*{\newconstant}[3][]{%
  \newglossaryentry{#2}{type=constants,%
    name={$#3$},text={#3},description={},#1}%
}
% Define operators
\newoperator{Mop}{\mathcal{M}}
\newoperator{Aalpha}{A_\alpha}
\newoperator{nablaOmega}{\nabla_\Omega}
\newoperator{T}{T}
\newoperator{I2}{I_2}
\newoperator{Jz}{J_z}
\newoperator{Gz}{G_z}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

In order to build the PDF you need to do:

1. Run pdflatex
2. Run makeglossaries
3. Run pdflatex

The above example produces:

Page 1:

page3.png (14.91 KiB) Viewed 15000 times

Page 2:

page2.png (5.54 KiB) Viewed 15000 times

Page 3:

page1.png (18.19 KiB) Viewed 15000 times

In your example image, you have some lines with multiple entries (for example, c, c_1, c_2[, \ldots, v_n). There are various ways to deal with these. You could designate the first in the list (e.g, c) as the main parent entry, and the remainder as sub-entries, and then define a glossary style that puts the sub-entry names after the parent entry name, but this will complicate the location list. However, I think the easiest solution is probably to define an entry with the specified list and then use \glsdisp or \glslink whenever you use it.

For example:

Code: Select all

1
\newconstant{c}{c, c_1, c_2, \ldots, v_n}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Then in the document:

Code: Select all

1
In-line: $\glslink{c}{c}$ or $\glslink{c}{c_1}$ or $\glslink{c}{c_2}$ etc.
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Regards
Nicola Talbot