Code: Select all
%\documentclass[final,authoryear,5p,times,twocolumn,sort&compress]{elsarticle}
\documentclass[final,3p,times]{elsarticle}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\journal{NDT\&E international}
%for figure at top of blank page
\makeatletter
\setlength\@fptop{0\p@}
%\preto{\@tabular}{\parskip=0pt}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\begin{frontmatter}
\title{Paper Title}
\begin{abstract}
\end{abstract}
\begin{keyword}
NDT \sep Data fusion \sep Mechanical parameters \sep Bayesian \sep Uncertainty
\end{keyword}
\end{frontmatter}
\begin{table}[htp]
\caption{Range of parameter values for granite}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c c} \toprule
Parameter & Range \\ \midrule
v$_{ultrasonic}$(m/s) (Stone Block) & 3694--3885 \\
v$_{sonic}$ (m/s)(Stone Block) & 4508--5332 \\
$\nu$ & 0.2--0.3 \\
$\rho$ (kg/m$^3$) & 2600--2800 \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{table:rangeofparameters}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[htp]
\caption{Prior and Posterior estimates of E (Normal Distribution) in GPa considering sonic and ultrasonic data}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{p{3.5cm} p{2.cm} p{2.5cm} p{2.5cm} p{2.5cm}} \toprule
Parameter & Literature & 1$^{st}$ Update & 2$^{nd}$ Update & 3$^{rd}$ Update\\ \midrule
$\mu$ & --- & 33.20 & 32.70 & 32.28 \\
$\sigma(\mu)$ & --- & 0.66 & 0.54 & 0.44 \\
$\sigma$ & --- & 6.59 & 5.33 & 4.35 \\
$\sigma(\sigma)$ & --- & 0.47 & 0.38 & 0.31 \\
95\% confidence interval for mean & --- & 32.12--34.29 & 31.82--33.59 & 31.57--33.00 \\
$\mu_{pop}$ & 35 & 33.21 & 32.70 & 32.26 \\
$\sigma_{population}$ & 7.5 & 7.25 & 5.89 & 4.80 \\
95\% confidence interval for population mean & 20.3--49.7 & 21.28--45.14 & 23.00--42.39 & 24.37--40.15 \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[h]
\caption{All acceptable responses for survey}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{p{2.5cm} p{2.cm} p{2.75cm} p{3.25cm}} \toprule
Test method & Literature Knowledge & Schmidt Hammer & Direct compressive test \\ \midrule
Literature Knowledge & 1 & (1/2,1,1/3,1/5,7,5,6,3,1/5,1/2) & (1/8,1/8,1/8,1/9,1/7,1/7,1/8,1/6,1/3,1/7) \\
Schmidt Hammer & Positive reciprocal & 1 & (1/7,1/8,1/5,1/6,1/8,1/9,1/8,1/8,1/3,1/5) \\
Direct compressive test & Positive reciprocal & Positive reciprocal & 1 \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[htp]
\caption{Proposed Trust Factors for NDT tests used to find Elastic Modulus (E)}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c c c} \toprule
NDT Test & Weightage (w) & Value of Trust Factor (T) \\ \midrule
Literature Knowledge & 0.1195 & 1.23 \\
Sonic Testing & 0.1080 & 1.24 \\
Ultrasonic Testing & 0.1149 & 1.23 \\
Direct Compression test & 0.6275 & 0.92 \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:ProposedTrustFactorsE}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[htp]
\caption{Prior and Posterior estimates of E (Normal Distribution) in GPa considering sonic and ultrasonic data including trust factors}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{p{3.5cm} p{2.cm} p{2.5cm} p{2.5cm} p{2.5cm}} \toprule
Parameter & Literature & Prior 2 & Prior 3 & Posterior 3 \\ \midrule
$\mu$ & --- & 33.25 & 32.72 & 32.30 \\
$\sigma(\mu)$ & --- & 1.42 & 1.36 & 1.27 \\
$\sigma$ & --- & 6.89 & 6.58 & 6.19 \\
$\sigma(\sigma)$ & --- & 1.03 & 0.98 & 0.91 \\
95\% confidence interval for mean & --- & 30.91-35.59 & 30.49-34.95 & 30.20-34.40 \\
$\mu_{pop}$ & 35 & 33.24 & 32.73 & 32.32 \\
$\sigma_{population}$ & 7.5 & 8.38 & 8.00 & 7.52 \\
95\% confidence interval for population mean & 20.3-49.7 & 19.44-47.04 & 19.56-45.89 & 19.95-44.68 \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:etrust}
\end{table}
\end{document}
H
instead of htp
. Is there some better option?