Hello all,
I'm putting together a paper where I end up using a lot of sub-equations. For the most part, I can list them out and reference them without any issues, but there is one section where I end up with 12 sub-equations labeled (16a)-(16l), but when I try to reference equation (16l) it pops up as (17). The labels are completely different between these two equations, yet it continues to do this.
Is there some sort of limit to the number of sub-equations that one can use in a given setting? And if so, how do I change that limit?
Thanks!
Math & Science ⇒ Limit for Sub-equation Numbering
Learn LaTeX easily with newest books:
The LaTeX Beginner's Guide: 2nd edition and perfect for students writing a thesis
The LaTeX Cookbook: 2nd edition full of practical examples for mathematics, physics, chemistry, and more
LaTeX Graphics with TikZ: the first book about TikZ for perfect drawings in your LaTeX thesis
-
Stefan Kottwitz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10359
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm
Re: Limit for Sub-equation Numbering
I don't think it's because of a limit, since the reference goes right to 17. Perhaps show a (compilable) reduced copy of your code with this equation. Remove or replace with dummy text, if you don't like to show the real content. We could check the code example if there's anything wrong and fix it.
Stefan
Stefan
LaTeX.org admin