GeneralBulding definitions, propositions, theorems, etc.

LaTeX specific issues not fitting into one of the other forums of this category.
Post Reply
anthony.actuary
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:25 am

Bulding definitions, propositions, theorems, etc.

Post by anthony.actuary »

Hello

This is my first post and I am very new to TeX. I am glad I found this forum. I am having a lot of difficulty building the code that will lead to a "definition, proposition,theorem" format. For instance I would want to a.) Build a stand alone definition followed by a discussion b.) build a definition followed immediately by proposition and theorems.

For the stand alone definition I attempted:

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
\begin{document}
\theoremstyle{Definition}
The definition
\end{document}

This code actually ran, but the result was really bad. What am I doing wrong, and how can I go about fixing it?

Thank you

anthony

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

gmedina
Posts: 2313
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:45 pm

Bulding definitions, propositions, theorems, etc.

Post by gmedina »

The amsthm package lets you handle those theorem-like structures. Refer to its documentation. Other useful documents: lshort, mathmode.
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,...
anthony.actuary
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:25 am

Re: Bulding definitions, propositions, theorems, etc.

Post by anthony.actuary »

I could not follow thier documentation. Are you aware of any sites whith a better illustration?

Anthony
balf
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:11 am

Bulding definitions, propositions, theorems, etc.

Post by balf »

Try the ntheorem package : there are more possibilities for customisation, and it handles better the end-of-proof symbol problem (where to put it when the proof ends with an display equation or group of equations). There is a good documentation, with a number of examples.

B.A.
Post Reply