I 'do undo', but get the same kind error reports. Why?
Why, if I really reverse changes to condition that works fine before?
Do not move your cursor near double underlined links — they are POPUP-ADs!!!
Избегайте попадания курсора на «ссылки» с двойным подчёркиванием — это ВСПЛЫВАЮЩАЯ РЕКЛАМА!!!
NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.
And: Currently, Packt sells ebooks for $4.99 each if you buy 5 of their over 1000 ebooks. If you choose only a single one, $9.99. How about combining 3 LaTeX books with Python, gnuplot, mathplotlib, Matlab, ChatGPT or other AI books? Epub and PDF. Bundle (3 books, add more for higher discount): https://packt.link/MDH5p
Stefan_K wrote:the definitions of the commands are missing, the syntax is like:
Yes, I do know, but it works fine before my changes.
Besides this, with true code I get the error message too:
I can show more code if you need. May be it is buf of Lyx-1.6?
Do not move your cursor near double underlined links — they are POPUP-ADs!!!
Избегайте попадания курсора на «ссылки» с двойным подчёркиванием — это ВСПЛЫВАЮЩАЯ РЕКЛАМА!!!
Do not move your cursor near double underlined links — they are POPUP-ADs!!!
Избегайте попадания курсора на «ссылки» с двойным подчёркиванием — это ВСПЛЫВАЮЩАЯ РЕКЛАМА!!!
What is the difference do you mean? Now it shows {} additionally to previous message?
Stefan_K wrote:the screenshot still shows the \figureautorefname definition is missing, there's not even {} like in the two lines below.
Rrrrrrrr!!!!! It works fine just today at morning, and 100 times earlier!
Ok, I write true code everywhere and now it works. Thank you very much!
But I still have this question: Why it was 100% working earlier with wrong code?
Do not move your cursor near double underlined links — they are POPUP-ADs!!!
Избегайте попадания курсора на «ссылки» с двойным подчёркиванием — это ВСПЛЫВАЮЩАЯ РЕКЛАМА!!!
Perhaps it was just a coincidence that it could be compiled with wrong code. The syntax might still have been compilable. Maybe I could explain if I could see a complete example of the wrong but compilable code. Without compilable example code it's just guessing. But good to hear that it's working now.
Do not move your cursor near double underlined links — they are POPUP-ADs!!!
Избегайте попадания курсора на «ссылки» с двойным подчёркиванием — это ВСПЛЫВАЮЩАЯ РЕКЛАМА!!!
yes, that can be compilable. There's some tolerance regarding the braces. The effect is, that \subsectionautorefname is defined as \par because \par is following, caused by the empty line.
If you remove that empty line you will notice that the compiler will generate the same error message Missing \begin{document}.
P.S. I am beginner at TeX/LaTeX and this is my very first document. I tried to use these commands removing {} to resolve some aspects, but without thorough knowledges. It was my fatal flaw. But LyX assists me to make this mistake, deceives me that I may do it further too, by compiling my wrong code for a long time. Additionally, I was disorientated getting error messages from the same code which was working just now. In my opinion, a programm must not permit user to make mistakes (especially as serious as mine) and, especially, mislead user. If you have relations to LyX developers, resolve this please.
Do not move your cursor near double underlined links — they are POPUP-ADs!!!
Избегайте попадания курсора на «ссылки» с двойным подчёркиванием — это ВСПЛЫВАЮЩАЯ РЕКЛАМА!!!
NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.
And: Currently, Packt sells ebooks for $4.99 each if you buy 5 of their over 1000 ebooks. If you choose only a single one, $9.99. How about combining 3 LaTeX books with Python, gnuplot, mathplotlib, Matlab, ChatGPT or other AI books? Epub and PDF. Bundle (3 books, add more for higher discount): https://packt.link/MDH5p