I'm using LyX 1.6 with Windows XP.
I have a longtable in my document which gives me error messages when I try to view the dvi or pdf. I'm attaching a screenshot and inserting the code below. Does anyone know what this is all about?
Thank you!
Code:
Code: Select all
\begin{sideways}
\begin{longtable}{>{\raggedright}p{5cm}>{\raggedright}p{4.5cm}>{\raggedright}p{4.5cm}>{\raggedright}p{4.5cm}}
\hline
\textbf{Hypothesis} & \textbf{Evidence in the interviews} & \textbf{Support for hypothesis if:} & \textbf{Example}\tabularnewline
\hline
\endhead
\hline
$H_{1}:$Greater issue interest leads to greater attempts at uploading
a country\textquoteright{}s own Latin America policy. & \emph{Code 1a: }Issues identified as being of particular interest
for a country
\emph{Code 1b:} Instances of trying to take issues to the European
level & \emph{Codes 1a} and \emph{1b} correspond \textendash{} i.e. issues
of particular interest also correspond to issues where \textquoteleft{}uploading\textquoteright{}
is attempted & \emph{Code 1a: }{}``human rights, the basic, human freedoms, the
promotion of democracy, these are all sort of key \emph{country }values;
tolerance, and so on.''
\emph{Code 1b: }{}``when the European Union was negotiating the Multiparty
Agreement with the Andean countries {[}...{]}\emph{ country} was insisting
on the insertion of the two political clauses into the agreement.''\tabularnewline
\hline
\hline
$H_{2}:$Issues that are under EU competence automatically lead to
a greater interaction of the national policy network with the European
level, which in turn leads to greater attempts at uploading. & \emph{Code 2a:} Instances of trying to influence issues of EU competence
\emph{Code 2b:} A connection between EU competence and trying to influence
an issue is established. & Instances of \emph{Code 2a} are found with greater frequency for issue
areas which are EU competence than for those where bilateral options
exist; additionally, instances of \emph{Code 2b} are found. & \tabularnewline
\hline
\hline
$H_{3a}$Countries with a more \textquoteleft{}European\textquoteright{}
domestic political culture are more willing to \textquoteleft{}download\textquoteright{}
issues from the EU agenda to the national policy agenda. & \emph{Code 3:} Instances of incorporating issues coming from the EU
level into the national agenda
\emph{Code 3a:} European action portrayed as \textquoteleft{}natural\textquoteright{};
\textquoteleft{}something country X does\textquoteright{} & \emph{Codes 3} and \emph{3a} coincide. & \tabularnewline
\hline
$H_{3b}$: Socialization by interaction at the European level influences
a country\textquoteright{}s willingness to download, and is stronger
in countries for which $H_{3a}$ holds. & \emph{Code 3b:} Interviewee mentions interaction at the EU level as
building up trust or a community & \emph{Codes 3} and \emph{3b} coincide; part two of the hypothesis
holds if this evidence is stronger in countries where $H_{3a}$also
holds. & \tabularnewline
\hline
\newpage
\hline
$H_{4}:$Socialization into EU-level cooperation occurs as a result
of wanting to keep a good reputation with fellow Member States. & \emph{Code 4:} Interviewee makes reference to perception of country
X by others as a motive for cooperation. & Evidence for \emph{Code 4} is present. & \tabularnewline
\hline
\end{longtable}
\end{sideways}
