General ⇒ Sort a list alphabetically

[Sydney]

Hi all,

How can I sort a list alphabetically?

I am doing like a dictionary, but I don't want to sort my items manually, is there a way to do it automatically?

Example:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
\begin{description}
\item[Bird] definition of a Bird
\item[Animal] definition of an Animal 
\item[Hello] definition of Hello
\item[Fantastic] definition of Fantastic
\item[Thanks] definition of Thanks
\end{description}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

I'd like to sort the words Bird, Animal, Hello, ... automatically. How can I do that?

Thanks very much.

Sydney

[Stefan Kottwitz]

Hi Sydney,

sorting can be done using makeindex.

Instead of writing a description list, I would use a package which is capable of sorting. My choice would be the glossaries package. This package uses makeindex, just as nomencl does.

Stefan

[Sydney]

Hi Stefan,

Thanks very much for your reply.

I am working on it, but I am having some issues with \printglossaries

I understand that I have to compile first, then makeglossaries myDoc (this step doesn't work for me on windows), and recompile again.

I'll let you know if I can do the step 2 on windows ...

Thanks,

Tony

[Stefan Kottwitz]

Hi Tony,

for the makeglossaries script a Perl installation is required. You could install ActivePerl on Windows.

However, you don't need that script. You could use makeindex directly. Have a look at 1.3.3 Using makeindex explicitly. It means calling

Code: Select all

1
makeindex -s ⟨style⟩.ist -t ⟨base⟩.glg -o ⟨base⟩.gls ⟨base⟩.glo
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

at the command prompt.

Which editor do you use? Some editors are capable of calling makeindex for you.

Stefan

[Sydney]

Hi Stefan_K,

That's alright. I get it! It works fine!!!!!

I just needed to install Perl so that the command makeindex from my terminal works.

Also, I used the package glossary instead of glossaries, does it matter? Are they any important differences between these 2?

Cheers mate,

For people who wants to do a glossary by using the package glossary:

1°/

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
\usepackage{glossary}
\makeglossary
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

2°/

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
\glossary{name={entry name}, description={entry description}}
%Here is an example
\glossary{name={hello}, description={an expression of greeting}}
\glossary{name={animal}, description={a living organism characterized by voluntary movement}}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

3°/ Then, you have to tell Latex where to place you glossary inside the document

Code: Select all

1
\printglossary
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

4°/ Then, things get complicated

First, you need to download perl if you don't have it.
Then, open a terminal. On windows, go to your working directory containing your MyLatexDocument.tex
Type latex MyLatexDocument

Your doc is compiling, and the files MyLatexDocument.glo MyLatexDocument.ist MyLatexDocument.glg and MyLatexDocument.gls are created.

Type the command makeindex MyLatexDocument.glo -s MyLatexDocument.ist -t MyLatexDocument.glg -o MyLatexDocument.gls

Finally, compile again:
Type latex MyLatexDocument



Sydney.

[Sydney]

Thanks Stefan,

Works perfectly indeed!

I am using Code::Blocks
Do you reckon it's fine?
I am not sure whether or not this editor is capable of calling makeindex for us. Do you know about this?

Thanks very much for your time.

Sydney

[localghost]

[…] I just needed to install Perl so that the command makeindex from my terminal works. […]

MakeIndex does not need Perl.


Thorsten

[nlct]

Also, I used the package glossary instead of glossaries, does it matter? Are they any important differences between these 2?

Yes, glossary is obsolete and no longer maintained. It was replaced by glossaries.

Regards
Nicola Talbot