General ⇒ hyperref pagebackrefs with xetex?
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 10:13 pm
hyperref pagebackrefs with xetex?
Also hyperref manual [1] made an impression, that it might be possible to make urls or refs to be highlighted or get border drawn around them, when they get focussed with mouse. I wonder, can they?
[1] http://www.tug.org/applications/hyperref/manual.html
Learn LaTeX easily with newest books:
The LaTeX Beginner's Guide: 2nd edition and perfect for students writing a thesis
The LaTeX Cookbook: 2nd edition full of practical examples for mathematics, physics, chemistry, and more
LaTeX Graphics with TikZ: the first book about TikZ for perfect drawings in your LaTeX thesis
Re: hyperref pagebackrefs with xetex?
I don't know if that's possible or not with the links, but what specifically in the hyperref manual gave you the impression that it was possible?
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 10:13 pm
hyperref pagebackrefs with xetex?
Well, there was this line:frabjous wrote:I don't know if that's possible or not with the links, but what specifically in the hyperref manual gave you the impression that it was possible?
I didn't try digging much about that, but nothing useful was found while looking through that html and also the pdf hyperref manual...pdfhighlight name /I How link buttons behave when selected; /I is for inverse (the default); the other possibilities are /N (no effect), /O (outline), and /P (inset highlighting).
frabjous wrote:packbackref is working for me with XeLaTeX.

-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 10:13 pm
hyperref pagebackrefs with xetex?
Code: Select all
\begin{document}
\input{cover}
\input{abstract}
\addtocontents{toc}{\protect\thispagestyle{empty}}
\addtocontents{toc}{\protect\pagestyle{empty}}
\tableofcontents
\newpage
\setcounter{page}{1}
\pagestyle{fancy}
\input{features/features}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{references}
\end{document}
hyperref pagebackrefs with xetex?
Yes, of course I meant pagebackref, sorry.Google has a single match: this thread! Maybe you misspelled?