BibTeX, biblatex and biberTrouble with Ordering of the References

Information and discussion about BiBTeX - the bibliography tool for LaTeX documents.
Post Reply
mmjoglekar
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:55 am

Trouble with Ordering of the References

Post by mmjoglekar »

Hi,

I am facing the following problem while using the article class. Need some help on this.

I am having list of figures, in which, some captions have references. Suppose there are four such citations.

So when I start my actual text (Chapter 1: Introduction), the first reference number is displayed as [5]. This is happening because the first four have been used in the list of figures.

This looks odd.

Is there any remedy to overcome this problem.

Thank you in advance.

Dekar

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org
LaTeX books
User avatar
localghost
Site Moderator
Posts: 9202
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:06 pm

Trouble with Ordering of the References

Post by localghost »

I don't know what you think about that but in my opinion references should not appear in lists like the LoF. So use the optional argument of the \caption command.

Code: Select all

\caption[Entry for LoF]{Caption with reference \cite{key}}
The reference now will appear only in the caption of your figure, but not in its LoF entry. The problem should not occur anymore. Otherwise provide a minimal working example (MWE) that shows the misbehaviour.


Best regards and welcome to the board
Thorsten¹
hannah2233
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 12:37 am

Re: Trouble with Ordering of the References

Post by hannah2233 »

I'm having the exact same problem.

localghost what do you mean by 'entry for LoF' in \caption[Entry for LoF]
I've been trying to solve this problem for a year now!
User avatar
Johannes_B
Site Moderator
Posts: 4182
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:08 pm

Re: Trouble with Ordering of the References

Post by Johannes_B »

Try it out ;-)

Sometimes, captions for a figure (or table, or ...) get pretty long describing the object. The list of ... is just for finding entries, nobody cares about any details, so the optional argument (in square brackets) set the list of ... entry.

Another thing, if your references are chronologically ordered, the first occurence is not in the list of ... anymore.
The smart way: Calm down and take a deep breath, read posts and provided links attentively, try to understand and ask if necessary.
Post Reply