Hi,
I am facing the following problem while using the article class. Need some help on this.
I am having list of figures, in which, some captions have references. Suppose there are four such citations.
So when I start my actual text (Chapter 1: Introduction), the first reference number is displayed as [5]. This is happening because the first four have been used in the list of figures.
This looks odd.
Is there any remedy to overcome this problem.
Thank you in advance.
Dekar
BibTeX, biblatex and biber ⇒ Trouble with Ordering of the References
- localghost
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 9202
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:06 pm
Trouble with Ordering of the References
I don't know what you think about that but in my opinion references should not appear in lists like the LoF. So use the optional argument of the \caption command.
The reference now will appear only in the caption of your figure, but not in its LoF entry. The problem should not occur anymore. Otherwise provide a minimal working example (MWE) that shows the misbehaviour.
Best regards and welcome to the board
Thorsten¹
Code: Select all
\caption[Entry for LoF]{Caption with reference \cite{key}}
Best regards and welcome to the board
Thorsten¹
How to make a "Minimal Example"
Board Rules
Avoidable Mistakes
¹ System: TeX Live 2025 (vanilla), TeXworks 0.6.10
Board Rules
Avoidable Mistakes
¹ System: TeX Live 2025 (vanilla), TeXworks 0.6.10
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 12:37 am
Re: Trouble with Ordering of the References
I'm having the exact same problem.
localghost what do you mean by 'entry for LoF' in \caption[Entry for LoF]
I've been trying to solve this problem for a year now!
localghost what do you mean by 'entry for LoF' in \caption[Entry for LoF]
I've been trying to solve this problem for a year now!
- Johannes_B
- Site Moderator
- Posts: 4182
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:08 pm
Re: Trouble with Ordering of the References
Try it out 
Sometimes, captions for a figure (or table, or ...) get pretty long describing the object. The list of ... is just for finding entries, nobody cares about any details, so the optional argument (in square brackets) set the list of ... entry.
Another thing, if your references are chronologically ordered, the first occurence is not in the list of ... anymore.

Sometimes, captions for a figure (or table, or ...) get pretty long describing the object. The list of ... is just for finding entries, nobody cares about any details, so the optional argument (in square brackets) set the list of ... entry.
Another thing, if your references are chronologically ordered, the first occurence is not in the list of ... anymore.
The smart way: Calm down and take a deep breath, read posts and provided links attentively, try to understand and ask if necessary.