Information and discussion about LaTeX's general text formatting features (e.g. bold, italic, enumerations, ...)
latexforever
Posts: 120 Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:40 pm
Post
by latexforever » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:25 am
Hello,
I would like to use the enumerate package to have such an output:
[1]: My first item,
[2]: My second item.
Inferring its manual (
http://www.dd.chalmers.se/latex/Docs/PDF/enumerate.pdf ), I would use such a partial code:
Code: Select all
Code, edit and compile here:
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Run LaTeX here
It does not work. I tried
Code: Select all
Code, edit and compile here:
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Run LaTeX here
with no success too.
Any suggestion would be much appreciated.
NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.
Stefan Kottwitz
Site Admin
Posts: 10324 Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm
Post
by Stefan Kottwitz » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:24 pm
Hi Luca,
the second code
Code: Select all
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
worked for me as well as
Code: Select all
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Stefan
LaTeX.org admin
latexforever
Posts: 120 Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:40 pm
Post
by latexforever » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:37 pm
Thanks for your answer, Stefan. That is possible that I made a typo when trying locally. It now works.
Is there a preferred (in the sense of the enumerate package, not in our sense) form?
Thanks.
Stefan Kottwitz
Site Admin
Posts: 10324 Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm
Post
by Stefan Kottwitz » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:44 pm
Hi Luca,
latexforever wrote: Is there a preferred (in the sense of the enumerate package, not in our sense) form?
regarding the enumerate-package, I don't see a reason to prefer a certain form as long as it's working.
But in general and in my opinion I would be careful when grouping by {...} to avoid changes in the kerning between characters, that's why I often prefer to use {word} instead of {w}ord for instance when I want to protect the first letter in this case.
Stefan
LaTeX.org admin
gmedina
Posts: 2313 Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:45 pm
Post
by gmedina » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:46 pm
You can also use the
enumitem package:
Code: Select all
Code, edit and compile here:
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Run LaTeX here
1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,233,...
latexforever
Posts: 120 Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:40 pm
Post
by latexforever » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:50 pm
gmedina wrote: You can also use the
enumitem package:
Code: Select all
Code, edit and compile here:
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Run LaTeX here
Pretty good! I will check it too. Thanks.
Stefan_K wrote: Hi Luca,
latexforever wrote: Is there a preferred (in the sense of the enumerate package, not in our sense) form?
regarding the enumerate-package, I don't see a reason to prefer a certain form as long as it's working.
But in general and in my opinion I would be careful when grouping by {...} to avoid changes in the kerning between characters, that's why I often prefer to use {word} instead of {w}ord for instance when I want to protect the first letter in this case.
Ok. Thanks.
rf
Posts: 21 Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:27 pm
Post
by rf » Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:54 pm
if you have
Code: Select all
Code, edit and compile here:
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Run LaTeX here
and then
Code: Select all
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
you get the correct result.
tex doesn't do bracket matching, so there's a lot of requests like
this