General ⇒ Too dumb for auto-completion?
Too dumb for auto-completion?
\begin{\begin{itemize}
\item
Too dumb for completion?
Bug?
Thank you for your time
Learn LaTeX easily with newest books:
The LaTeX Beginner's Guide: 2nd edition and perfect for students writing a thesis
The LaTeX Cookbook: 2nd edition full of practical examples for mathematics, physics, chemistry, and more
LaTeX Graphics with TikZ: the first book about TikZ for perfect drawings in your LaTeX thesis
- Stefan Kottwitz
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10348
- Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:44 pm
Too dumb for auto-completion?
welcome to the board!
The auto-completion behaves different than you're expecting. Type item and auto-complete... I'm used to the other way too because of other editors, the handling could be smarter.
Stefan
Too dumb for auto-completion?
sorry this is a slightly different question, but you might know:
Is there any way I could add a new command to TexNic Centre's autocomplete function? - I want to add the commands from the "todonotes" package (http://www.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/help/C ... notes.html).
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
Too dumb for auto-completion?
If you haven't looked it up on bing or google already...?tfs1 wrote:Is there any way I could add a new command to TexNic Centre's autocomplete function?

Let's say you installed TC in F:\programs.
Go to
Code: Select all
F:\Programs\TeXnicCenter\packages
Code: Select all
TeX.xml
If you can not figure it out by yourself, please reply.

If you can figure it out by yourself, please reply.

Re: Too dumb for auto-completion?

I have modifided the Tex.xml, added command.
Question: Do you know how I can make the cursor jump into the curly brackets when using autocomplete.
E.g. I added "\stodo[inline]" what happens when I use autocomplete the cursor goes into the "[inline]" but not into the "{}" brackets. Any ideas?
Thanks again!