GeneralPDF output quality is very poor

LaTeX specific issues not fitting into one of the other forums of this category.
Post Reply
xlynx3
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:17 pm

PDF output quality is very poor

Post by xlynx3 »

Hi all,
I'm using WinEdt and integrated PdfLatex for creating pdf files.
I was using Acrobat Reader 6 and everything was perfectly good. I upgraded it to Acrobat Reader 9 then the pdf documents quality become very poor. They're too faded/worn. Has anyone experienced a problem like this before?
Last edited by xlynx3 on Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

xlynx3
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:17 pm

PDF output quality is very poor

Post by xlynx3 »

i have figure out that the problem is caused by the additional language packages.

if i use like this, text quality become good.

Code: Select all

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{caption}
but if i use the code below, it becomes very poor.

Code: Select all

\documentclass[11pt]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[turkish]{babel}
\usepackage[latin5]{inputenc}
\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{caption}
How can i fix this problem..
phi
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:10 pm

PDF output quality is very poor

Post by phi »

You need an outline font that supports the T1 encoding, for example Latin Modern. Modern distributions should have Latin Modern already installed. In that case, simply add

Code: Select all

\usepackage{lmodern}
at the beginning of the preamble.
kaiserkarl13
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:02 pm

Re: PDF output quality is very poor

Post by kaiserkarl13 »

As mentioned in the previous post, this is a font problem. My guess is that you don't have the default (Computer Modern) fonts in the T1 encoding (who does?), so it uses bitmapped versions instead. These invariably look like garbage in Adobe Reader.

There are two packages that may alleviate this problem (if not solve it): ae and aecompl. These packages effectively substitute out the bitmapped T1 fonts for their equivalent OT1 fonts (when available) and use the bitmapped fonts whenever they don't have a glyph for the symbol in OT1.

I hope that helps!
phi
Posts: 577
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: PDF output quality is very poor

Post by phi »

Since the appearance of the cm-super and Latin Modern fonts, the ae package can be considered obsolete. These fonts (especially Latin Modern) offer high-quality alternatives to Computer Modern covering T1 and many other encodings, which renders the original Computer Modern fonts and the ae package unnecessary.
xlynx3
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:17 pm

Re: PDF output quality is very poor

Post by xlynx3 »

thanks for your replies. I think this was a weird problem but the latex-community is perfect too :)
"lmodern" package solved the issue. Thanks again ;)
daleif
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:46 am

Re: PDF output quality is very poor

Post by daleif »

This is usually when people does not do a full installation of MikTeX (or perhaps TeXLive).

This is why I always tell people to install everything, even though you might noe need it all, it is still better to be safe.

I have no idea why the minimal MikTeX does not include CM-super when it is a well known fact that this leeds to bad looking PDF files.

Anyway, the lmodern fonts will replace the CM fonts as the base LaTeX font at some point in the future, solving the problem for good.
Post Reply