Text Formatting ⇒ Is there a way to get different outputs from \newcommand?

[nikio]

I'd like to have a command with optional input that does the following:
if there is no input the output would be A_{ab}
if I input [cd] the output would be A_{ab to cd}
At the moment I use \newcommand like this
\newcommand{\A}[1][]{\ensuremath{A_{ab #1}}}
but in this way I have to input "to cd" instead of "cd"... not a big deal but when I'll have to insert something more complex it will become annoying

Is there a way to make \newcommand do it or some better alternative that someone knows about?

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
\documentclass[]{article}
\newcommand{\A}[1][]{\ensuremath{A_{ab #1}}}
\begin{document}
    
this is how my command works
\verb*|$\A$| $\rightarrow$  $\A$
\verb*|$\A[cd]$| $\rightarrow$  $\A[cd]$
\verb*|$\A[, cd]$| $\rightarrow$    $\A[, cd]$\\
but I'd like this:
\verb*|$\A[cd]$| $\rightarrow$  $\A[, cd]$
    
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

[Bartman]

You can use the \IfNoValueTF command or its reverse form (ltnews32) to check whether there is an optional argument or not.

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\documentclass{article}
\newcommand{\A}[1][]{%
  \IfNoValueTF{#1}
    {\ensuremath{A_{ab}}}
    {\ensuremath{A_{ab,#1}}}
}
\begin{document}
\verb*|$\A$| $\rightarrow\A$
\verb*|$\A[cd]$| $\rightarrow\A[cd]$
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

[nikio]

I think I'm missing something: your reply seems logically what should do the job but doesn't work as I expected, in the No Value option the second option is executed with no value,
I changed a little the code to make it clearer I hope:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
\documentclass{article}
\newcommand{\F}[1][]{
    \IfNoValueTF{#1}
    {\ensuremath{F_{A}}}
    {\ensuremath{F_{A\rightarrow #1}}}
}
\begin{document}
    
    \verb*|$\F$| outputs $\F$ \qquad instead of $F_A$ with no arrow
    
    \verb*|$\F[B]$| outputs $\F[B]$ \qquad OK
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

[nikio]

I think I found the problem. If no argument is inserted, an empty value is returned which is different from a "NoValue" value, therefore \IfNoValueTF returns always false.

I found a couple of soutions to deal with the problem:

The first does not require packages but uses some somewhat cryptic Tex code:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
\documentclass{article}
\newcommand{\F}[1][]{
    {
        \ifx&#1&
        \ensuremath{F_{A}}
        \else
        \ensuremath{F_{A\rightarrow #1}}
        \fi}
    }
\begin{document}
    \verb*|$\F$| outputs $\F$ \qquad OK
    
    \verb*|$\F[B]$| outputs $\F[B]$ \qquad OK
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

The second is quite straightforward but needs a supplementary package:

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{ifthen}
\newcommand{\F}[1][]{
        \ifthenelse{\equal{#1}{}}
        {\ensuremath{F_{A}}}
        {\ensuremath{F_{A\rightarrow #1}}}
}
\begin{document}
    \verb*|$\F$| outputs $\F$ \qquad OK
    
    \verb*|$\F[B]$| outputs $\F[B]$ \qquad OK
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

Thank you Bartman for pointing me in the right direction by suggesting to insert a condition in the execution of the \newcommand

[Bartman]

Sorry for my carelessness. I overlooked the narrow comma in the output and mistakenly assumed that in this case you could ignore the difference to the replacement commands for \newcommand.

Code: Select all

Code, edit and compile here:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
\documentclass{article}
\NewDocumentCommand{\F}{o}{
  \IfNoValueTF{#1}
    {\ensuremath{F_{A}}}
    {\ensuremath{F_{A\rightarrow #1}}}
}
\begin{document}
\verb*|$\F$| outputs $\F$
    
\verb*|$\F[B]$| outputs $\F[B]$
\end{document}
 
 
הההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההההה
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Run LaTeX here

[nikio]

Thank you, exactly what I was looking for, I'll have to have a better look into this \NewDocumentCommand!