Search found 63 matches

by lalop
Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:06 pm
Forum: Math & Science
Topic: Nonstandard Analysis in Latex
Replies: 3
Views: 2187

Re: Nonstandard Analysis in Latex

Sorry for the bump, but I had to do a gazillion of the *'s in my article (Nonstandard Analysis from a Model-Theoretic Perspective) and probably the best way to do so is:

  1. \usepackage{leftidx}
  2.  
  3. ...
  4.  
  5. {^*}R,
  6.  
  7. (and if you want, the package also works for left subscripts) {^*_1}R
by lalop
Sat Apr 10, 2010 5:26 am
Forum: General
Topic: arrayjob no longer works?
Replies: 3
Views: 1611

Re: arrayjob no longer works?

Hm, can someone else who uses miktex 2.8 check it out?
by lalop
Sat Apr 10, 2010 4:22 am
Forum: General
Topic: arrayjob no longer works?
Replies: 3
Views: 1611

arrayjob no longer works?

When I recently tried my old algorithm, it came up with strange errors. I think I managed to trace it to this minimal example: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{arrayjob} \newarray\arrayname \readarray{arrayname}{carg&Ma&place} \begin{document} Foo \end{document} Does this work for you guy...
by lalop
Sat Feb 20, 2010 7:03 am
Forum: Text Formatting
Topic: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref
Replies: 8
Views: 3957

Re: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref

oh well : x as i said, i can customize \thref instead
by lalop
Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:38 pm
Forum: Texmaker and TeXstudio
Topic: TexMakerX (with interactive spellchecking!)
Replies: 138
Views: 64911

Re: TexMakerX (with interactive spellchecking!)

Perhaps I can change it so, that there are different bracket categories, so that brackets from different categories are never assigned to eachother, however I have never idea how the bracket matching works in qcodeedit, since I never looked at function of the source so far. But why are you even usi...
by lalop
Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:32 am
Forum: Texmaker and TeXstudio
Topic: TexMakerX (with interactive spellchecking!)
Replies: 138
Views: 64911

Re: TexMakerX (with interactive spellchecking!)

I agree that the parentheses-code folding should be fixed if at all feasible. For instance, I can't even use the numbering system 1), etc without breaking the code folding.
by lalop
Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:24 am
Forum: Others
Topic: LaTexLab.org - Open Source Web Based LaTex Editor
Replies: 12
Views: 19717

Re: LaTexLab.org - Open Source Web Based LaTex Editor

Something like this has been much needed for a long time.
by lalop
Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:18 am
Forum: Text Formatting
Topic: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref
Replies: 8
Views: 3957

Re: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref

It does work, though, if you remove the ntheorem line:

  1. \documentclass{book}
  2. \usepackage{amsmath}
  3.  
  4. \begin{document}
  5.  
  6. \[ a=b \tag{hi} \]
  7.  
  8. \end{document}
by lalop
Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:09 pm
Forum: Text Formatting
Topic: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref
Replies: 8
Views: 3957

Re: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref

gmedina wrote:...


Try:
  1. \documentclass{book}
  2. \usepackage{amsmath}
  3. \usepackage[amsmath,amsthm,thref,thmmarks]{ntheorem}
  4.  
  5. \begin{document}
  6.  
  7. \[ a=b \tag{hi} \]
  8.  
  9. \end{document}
by lalop
Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:18 am
Forum: Text Formatting
Topic: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref
Replies: 8
Views: 3957

Re: Proposition, Theorem, etc numbering and \ref

Hm, the option thmmarks seems to conflict with \tag in the \[ \] environment; it comes with an error saying tag isn't allowed. Current options: [amsmath,amsthm,thref,thmmarks] or [amsmath,plain,thref,thmmarks] [It's not that terribly great a problem, I guess, since I can just define my own command t...

Go to advanced search