BibTeX, biblatex and biberGetting rid of dashes in References

Information and discussion about BiBTeX - the bibliography tool for LaTeX documents.
Post Reply
atwinix
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:57 am

Getting rid of dashes in References

Post by atwinix »

Hello All,

I have often had a problem when citing the same author in a document. For example for when two different works by the same author, the name of the author in the second reference will appear as dashes ( ----- ).

Code: Select all

\documentclass{IEEEtran}

\begin{document}

\title{Advanced Referencing}
\author{Example One}{exone@swin.edu.au}{}

\maketitle

\section{Introduction}

\IEEEPARstart{T}{his} is an example. \bstctlcite{IEEEexample:BSTcontrol} \cite{Goldratt.1994}  Citing the same author. \cite{Goldratt.1997}

\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
\bibliography{ieeebibctl}
\end{document}
I have tried to use the IEEEtrantools.sty file but I can an error telling me that

Code: Select all

! Package IEEEtrantools Error: IEEEtrantools is not for use with the
(IEEEtrantools)                IEEEtran class.
Is there any way I can get rid of the dashes and display the author name instead? I have attached the pdf file for anyone wanting to see the output.

Thanks,
atwinix
Attachments
advref.pdf
(30.05 KiB) Downloaded 370 times

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

And: Currently, Packt sells ebooks for $4.99 each if you buy 5 of their over 1000 ebooks. If you choose only a single one, $9.99. How about combining 3 LaTeX books with Python, gnuplot, mathplotlib, Matlab, ChatGPT or other AI books? Epub and PDF. Bundle (3 books, add more for higher discount): https://packt.link/MDH5p

frabjous
Posts: 2064
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:20 am

Re: Getting rid of dashes in References

Post by frabjous »

The file you would need to edit is the bibliography style file IEEEtran.bst -- or perhaps just pick a different bibliographic style altogether. (I'm afraid I don't know what the required edits would be offhand.) What's wrong with the line of dashes? That's a fairly common bibliographical convention.
Post Reply