I've come across a problem where I have two references that could be confused if they are referred to in the abbreviated form (same first author, same year); however, the references appear in different sections of my document, and cannot be confused due to the the context in which I use them.
I am unable to force the use of the abbreviated form of the citation using \cite**{ref}.
Does anybody know if this the desired behaviour? Can anyone suggest a workaround? In this section of the document, I make liberal use of \citeasnoun, and having a great list of author's names appearing isn't all that desirable!
I've contacted Peter Williams about it, and he hasn't looked at the code in a decade, so suggested asking the community.
I've attached a minimal working example to illustrate the point.
Code: Select all
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{harvard}\begin{document}%first appearence: long form (default behaviour)1.\\\cite{Perera_2003_918}\\\cite{Perera_2004_915}\\\cite{Perera_2004_920}%second appearence: should be abbr. form (default behaviour)% last two refs stay long as they can be confused2.\\\cite{Perera_2003_918}\\\cite{Perera_2004_915}\\\cite{Perera_2004_920}%try to force abbr. ref.% last two stay as long refs, even if forced to abbr.3.\\\cite**{Perera_2003_918}\\\cite**{Perera_2004_915}\\\cite**{Perera_2004_920}\begin{thebibliography}{xx}\harvarditem{Perera, Blackford, Vance, Hanna, Finnie \harvardand\Nicholson}{2004}{Perera_2004_920}Perera, D.~S., Blackford, M.~G., Vance, E.~R., Hanna, J.~V., Finnie, K.~S.\harvardand\ Nicholson, C.~L. \harvardyearleft 2004\harvardyearright .\newblock Geopolymers for the immobilization of radioactive waste, {\em in}J.~M. Hanchar, S.~Stroes-Gascoyne \harvardand\ L.~Browning (eds), {\em MRSProceedings - Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVIII}, Vol.824, p.~CC8.35.\harvarditem{Perera, Nicholson, Blackford, Fletcher \harvardand\Trautman}{2004}{Perera_2004_915}