Generaleepic conflicts with slashbox

LaTeX specific issues not fitting into one of the other forums of this category.
Post Reply
mro
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:49 pm

eepic conflicts with slashbox

Post by mro »

The problem is quickly explained: \backslashbox{bla}{blubb} does not produce the desired diagonal line when the eepic package is included, no matter whether before or after slashbox. :| :x :(

Code: Select all

\documentclass[12pt,twoside,a4paper,english]{book}

%\usepackage{eepic} % when this is off it works
\usepackage{slashbox}

\begin{document}

\backslashbox{\bf Compression}{\bf Decompression}

\end{document}

Recommended reading 2024:

LaTeXguide.org • LaTeX-Cookbook.net • TikZ.org

NEW: TikZ book now 40% off at Amazon.com for a short time.

localghost
Site Moderator
Posts: 9202
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:06 pm

eepic conflicts with slashbox

Post by localghost »

The eepic (and epic) package can be considered outdated. For very simple graphics you could try the pict2e package which is also an extension to the LaTeX picture environment. But there are much more powerful graphics packages like pgf/tikZ and PSTricks. These packages probably avoid the clash with the slashbox package.


Best regards
Thorsten¹
mro
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:49 pm

Re: eepic conflicts with slashbox

Post by mro »

I actually use eepic output from gnuplot as that looked best, compared to the alternative terminals that I have tried... for my version of gnuplot anyway -.-
User avatar
localghost
Site Moderator
Posts: 9202
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:06 pm

eepic conflicts with slashbox

Post by localghost »

mro wrote:I actually use eepic output from gnuplot as that looked best, compared to the alternative terminals that I have tried... for my version of gnuplot anyway -.-
Gnuplot has terminals which do much better looking output. But this depends a little bit on your compilation route (LaTeX -> PDF, LaTeX -> DVI -> PS, ...). The graphics packages I mentioned (except pict2e) also support plotting.
Post Reply