The problem is known and should be already fixed. Perhaps it is not yet on the mirror you used for installation. The fix came with revision 17448 of texlive-scripts.win32 package.
Cheers,
Tomek
Search found 208 matches
- Tue Mar 16, 2010 4:27 pm
- Forum: TeX Live and MacTeX
- Topic: TexLive 2009 "runscript.dll no such file or directory"
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3721
- Sat Feb 20, 2010 6:35 pm
- Forum: LEd
- Topic: Possible to make LEd close and compile PDF?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4687
Re: Possible to make LEd close and compile PDF?
Depends on which PDF viewer you use. For Adobe Reader you are out of luck, since LEd doesn't have DDE to talk to AR. You could go around this by calling a command line DDE tool from LEd, but the last time I checked none of such tools I could find actually worked. If you are OK with using an alternat...
- Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:53 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Where to place config file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 921
Re: Where to place config file
You don't say which TeX distribution you use. I don't know about MiKTeX, but for TeX Live, these definitions should go into you personal texmf.cnf config file. Consult the documentation on where to find/place this file. For a list of cnf files currently in use (the default one is well documented): k...
- Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:17 pm
- Forum: TeX Live and MacTeX
- Topic: Tex Live basic and revtex4
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16919
Re: Tex Live basic and revtex4
Is replacing revtex4 by revtex4-1 going to cause me bad trouble? I'm not sure about how "bad" problems it can create, but there are still some bugs in the new version of revtex. However, the previous version is still available in TL as revtex4 package. Just use the TL package manager to i...
- Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:52 am
- Forum: TeX Live and MacTeX
- Topic: Install all new packages in TexLive
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9246
Re: Install all new packages in TexLive
airblaster wrote:"tlmgr update --self --all" ignores the option --all
This is actually a bug. Just to confirm, you are on Windows, right?
This should be fixed with the next infrastructure update. Thanks for the report.
Cheers,
Tomek
- Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:30 pm
- Forum: MiKTeX and proTeXt
- Topic: running latex from a USB stick
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10320
Re: running latex from a USB stick
A batch file changing the path variable of the system is no good solution for me, as AFAIK you need special rights to do so, don't you? No, the batch file only changes the path for its own process and applications started from it. The system and user paths stored in the registry are not affected. O...
- Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:03 pm
- Forum: Decision Guidance
- Topic: Which is the best WYSIWYG latex editor
- Replies: 2
- Views: 29346
- Sun Sep 27, 2009 4:11 pm
- Forum: Graphics, Figures & Tables
- Topic: eps to pstricks, pgf or eepic (impossible?)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4440
Re: eps to pstricks, pgf or eepic (impossible?)
I've seen your pictures. They are fairly simple geometry drawings with a few text labels. I would use TikZ for something like this. There are programs capable of converting rasterized line art to vector graphics but this doesn't make sense in your case. No program that I know of is capable of recove...
- Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:46 pm
- Forum: Graphics, Figures & Tables
- Topic: eps to pstricks, pgf or eepic (impossible?)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4440
Re: eps to pstricks, pgf or eepic (impossible?)
What sort of LaTeX code you would expect from conversion of a raster image? What you are trying to do just doesn't make sense. Perhaps explain why do you need to convert those raster images in the first place and then we can try to find a solution to your real problem.
Cheers,
Tomek
Cheers,
Tomek
- Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:42 pm
- Forum: MiKTeX and proTeXt
- Topic: Unable to uninstall MikTex in Vista
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7886
Re: Unable to uninstall MikTex in Vista
To start elevated command prompt, right click on cmd.exe (or a shortcut to it) and choose "Run as ...". You should enter the uninstall command exactly as defined in the registry. I don't know what the copystart.exe does, but judging from its name it probably copies the uninstaller to a dif...