Hello Frabjous,
Thank you for your brilliantly detailed post. I have been out of action for a few days and am deeply sorry I have not been here to thank you sooner. I should have made sure to check sooner. :oops:
Your solution looks excellent, and I really look forward to attempting to employ it ...
Search found 10 matches
- Wed Feb 02, 2011 1:30 pm
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: Begriffsschrift
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3941
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:46 pm
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: Begriffsschrift
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3941
Re: Begriffsschrift
Hi,
I've figured out the answer to my second question - it was pretty obvious actually! Still stuck on question number one though.
Thanks!
I've figured out the answer to my second question - it was pretty obvious actually! Still stuck on question number one though.
Thanks!
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:26 pm
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: Begriffsschrift
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3941
Re: Begriffsschrift
Also, a second question, is it possible to use the begriff notation without automatically going onto a new line - namely, can we have <text><begriff><text> rather than
<text>
<begriff>
<text>
?
Thanks for the help!
<text>
<begriff>
<text>
?
Thanks for the help!
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:10 pm
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: Two distinct sets of footnotes
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3501
Re: Two distinct sets of footnotes
Hey meho_r,
I was looking for exactly the same thing today, and found this thread. I'm new to latex and I don't know exactly how your solution works, but it works perfectly for what I need.
So thanks alot.
Junket
I was looking for exactly the same thing today, and found this thread. I'm new to latex and I don't know exactly how your solution works, but it works perfectly for what I need.
So thanks alot.
Junket
- Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:27 pm
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: Begriffsschrift
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3941
Begriffsschrift
Hello, I hope this is an appropriate place to post.
I'm using the begriff package for Frege.
I have one tiny snag with it, that I was hoping someone might have a solution to.
Now, it is a small problem, so it's not the end of the world if I can't solve it, but if someone happens to have an answer ...
I'm using the begriff package for Frege.
I have one tiny snag with it, that I was hoping someone might have a solution to.
Now, it is a small problem, so it's not the end of the world if I can't solve it, but if someone happens to have an answer ...
- Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:29 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: finding/importing symbols
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4795
Re: finding/importing symbols
Thanks again frabjous,
That's brilliant.
I adapted your newcommand like this:
\newcommand{\ddM}[1]{\ensuremath{\overline{\overline{\mathrm{#1}}}}}
so that I can pass it a text variable.
Thanks!
That's brilliant.
I adapted your newcommand like this:
\newcommand{\ddM}[1]{\ensuremath{\overline{\overline{\mathrm{#1}}}}}
so that I can pass it a text variable.
Thanks!

- Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:13 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: finding/importing symbols
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4795
Re: finding/importing symbols
P.S. I have already checked "The Comprehensive Latex Symbols List" but cannot locate what I am looking for (perhaps it is there however and I have searched badly).
But basically, I have tried quite hard to find this symbol, so I would be very grateful if someone was able to help.
Thanks
But basically, I have tried quite hard to find this symbol, so I would be very grateful if someone was able to help.
Thanks
- Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:05 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: finding/importing symbols
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4795
Re: finding/importing symbols
Hello again,
Further to my previous questions I have one niggling issue remaining.
When I want to double overline e.g. M, I am doing this
$\overline{\overline{M}}$
It works re: the double overhead but it is putting M in italics.
The same happens for the single overline
$\overline{M}$
Any ideas on ...
Further to my previous questions I have one niggling issue remaining.
When I want to double overline e.g. M, I am doing this
$\overline{\overline{M}}$
It works re: the double overhead but it is putting M in italics.
The same happens for the single overline
$\overline{M}$
Any ideas on ...
- Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:34 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: finding/importing symbols
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4795
Re: finding/importing symbols
Thank you frabjous,
1) I did not think you could do the overline twice, thanks!
2) Yep, it is indeed /sim!
3) I only need the basic candlestick stuff at the moment, no ancestrals even, so this package should work fine!
You've been really helpful. Thank you so much for both the direct advice and the ...
1) I did not think you could do the overline twice, thanks!
2) Yep, it is indeed /sim!
3) I only need the basic candlestick stuff at the moment, no ancestrals even, so this package should work fine!
You've been really helpful. Thank you so much for both the direct advice and the ...
- Sat Jan 22, 2011 10:49 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: finding/importing symbols
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4795
finding/importing symbols
Hello there, I am new to latex and would greatly appreciate some basic advice, whether directly, or by way of some useful links, or even both.
I have just downloaded teXnicCenter and the first thing I have noticed is that it does not seem to be immediately possible to double overline a symbol. I ...
I have just downloaded teXnicCenter and the first thing I have noticed is that it does not seem to be immediately possible to double overline a symbol. I ...