LaTeX.org

I've in been contact with the package author. He was very helpful.

First he pointed to the mergedate option: there is no option for suppressing the month (that would seem odd to me), but maybe the "mergedate" option is what you're actually looking for? mergedate=false won't suppress the month, but ...

Maybe you can solve the problem with biblatex? It is a very capable package. Check their examples if there is a style matching your preference. Maybe the verbose is what you are looking for?

You need the package logreq.

Yes, I can either edit all database entries with a more detailed date field than year (to just the year) or delete the date field and replace it with a year field. However I'd rather be able to suppress the month (and day) since I might need detailed dates for other documents.

Ideally I do not want to do changes to the database since I'm gonna use it for other documents which might benefit from having more detailed dates than just the year.

Hello

I'm using biblatex. Is there any way to suppress the month in the bibliography without deleting months from the bib file? For example it prints: Dretske, Fred I. (Dec. 24, 1970). “Epistemic Operators”. In: The Journal of Philosophy 67.24, pp. 1007–1023. issn: 0022362X. JSTOR: 2024710. Instead ...

Thanks for answering and answering fast. Appreciated.

I got it working the way I wanted it by setting left margin in enumerate. I tried different values until the margin was big enough to fit the longest labels. The finished example: \documentclass[12pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{lipsum ...

Is there a way to stop labels from ending up in the margin? Here is an example where the last two labels is clearly in the left margin:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\begin{document}

\begin{enumerate}[start=22,label=(\arabic*)]
\item Bla bla bla\ldots
\end ...

The backref implementation in biblatex does this by deafult. You can also control it somewhat. Check its documentation.

Thanks. I'm afraid controlling the counter by hand as in \begin{pvn}[start=1] is not an option since I want the series to be able to overlap with a result such as the following (with or without running text between the list items):
d1 bla
d2 bla
e1 bla
d3 bla
e2 bla

I'm using the labels to list ...