That's exactly what I did, see the MWE.
Well, except that I switch to \texttt inside it in order to get a more appropriate looking operator. The default % sign doesn't look the least bit like a modulo operator.
edit: Posted at about the same time as the (edit to the) post above, sorry for any ...
Search found 4 matches
- Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:20 am
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: Removing italics/ensuring not italic/theorem environment
- Replies: 3
- Views: 25452
- Sun Dec 19, 2010 3:12 am
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: Removing italics/ensuring not italic/theorem environment
- Replies: 3
- Views: 25452
Removing italics/ensuring not italic/theorem environment
I'm trying to replace the built-in \bmod operator (which, rather unhelpfully, just types the word "mod") with a proper modulo operator: %. I'm currently using \texttt{\%}. It's not ideal (an ideal modulo operator should really be almost square, but the font used by \texttt has a very narrow and tall ...
- Sun May 30, 2010 6:44 pm
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: parbox that adds no vertical space?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5145
Re: parbox that adds no vertical space?
Perfect, thanks!
- Sun May 30, 2010 6:02 pm
- Forum: Text Formatting
- Topic: parbox that adds no vertical space?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5145
parbox that adds no vertical space?
I'm looking for a way to make a parbox that renders as a multi-line box of text, but whose height, for layout purposes, is considered to be just one line, so that following text is unaffected.
Here's a MWE that shows the issue:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{algorithm}
\usepackage ...
Here's a MWE that shows the issue:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{algorithm}
\usepackage ...