Search found 3 matches
- Fri May 30, 2014 4:45 pm
- Forum: BibTeX, biblatex and biber
- Topic: Two Years for a single Bibliography Entry
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8005
Re: Two Years for a single Bibliography Entry
Okay, I put this up once more. Still no answer? Anybody?
- Tue Apr 16, 2013 8:36 pm
- Forum: BibTeX, biblatex and biber
- Topic: Two Years for a single Bibliography Entry
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8005
Re: Two Years for a single Bibliography Entry
A small addition:
Writing {1690/2008} into the year-entry of my bibtex file (call it locke1690) does not give the result "Locke (1690/2008)" if I type cite{locke1690}.
Any more ideas?
Writing {1690/2008} into the year-entry of my bibtex file (call it locke1690) does not give the result "Locke (1690/2008)" if I type cite{locke1690}.
Any more ideas?
- Mon Apr 15, 2013 8:56 pm
- Forum: BibTeX, biblatex and biber
- Topic: Two Years for a single Bibliography Entry
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8005
Two Years for a single Bibliography Entry
Hi there,
this is my first entry, so please be patient – and many thanks in advance for that. :)
I am writing an article on a historical subject, and would like to include the year of first publication in addition to the year of the publication I use. For example: Locke (1690/2008)
If I simply ...
this is my first entry, so please be patient – and many thanks in advance for that. :)
I am writing an article on a historical subject, and would like to include the year of first publication in addition to the year of the publication I use. For example: Locke (1690/2008)
If I simply ...