That's works perfectly, thanks!
Out of curiosity then, why did it work when I compiled to tex source, outside of Lyx?
Search found 4 matches
- Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:08 am
- Forum: LyX
- Topic: undefined control sequence on a defined macro
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7825
- Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:16 am
- Forum: LyX
- Topic: undefined control sequence on a defined macro
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7825
Re: undefined control sequence on a defined macro
Addendum: It seems to have something to do with the ams package. using any ams symbol directly (no macro) anywhere in the document, allows for compilation. This includes actually calling \leqslant, followed by \leq (with \leq --> \leqslant).
- Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:17 pm
- Forum: LyX
- Topic: undefined control sequence on a defined macro
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7825
undefined control sequence on a defined macro
Hi,
thanks for the quick reply. Here's the log file for compiling without
thanks for the quick reply. Here's the log file for compiling without
\subsetneq
.- Mon Mar 26, 2012 4:20 am
- Forum: LyX
- Topic: undefined control sequence on a defined macro
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7825
undefined control sequence on a defined macro
Hello,
I seem to be experiencing an odd issue with lyx.
I have a macro mapping \leq to \leqslant.
Withing the document I'm editing this works fine, but if I start a new document in which the only macro is the one above and the only symbol is \leq, I get an undefined control sequence error. There ...
I seem to be experiencing an odd issue with lyx.
I have a macro mapping \leq to \leqslant.
Withing the document I'm editing this works fine, but if I start a new document in which the only macro is the one above and the only symbol is \leq, I get an undefined control sequence error. There ...