that is what I thought at first -- I had long section titles, and hyperref
(or cite or natbib) repeated tjhem for every entry. But that is why I removed
line by line... from a 20,000 line document to identify the source of the
error until I came up with the sample I listed above... it has all ...
Search found 3 matches
- Fri May 01, 2009 10:12 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: size-limit for aux, problem w/ hyperref, natbib, include
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6821
- Fri May 01, 2009 8:35 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: size-limit for aux, problem w/ hyperref, natbib, include
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6821
Re: size-limit for aux, problem w/ hyperref, natbib, include
thank you.
that solves the problem for now -- apparently \include is different
from \input (if there is a duplicate \end{document})
but I am still confused how adding one extra bibtex entry, even changing
the length of one entry by one character makes the difference between
compiling without ...
that solves the problem for now -- apparently \include is different
from \input (if there is a duplicate \end{document})
but I am still confused how adding one extra bibtex entry, even changing
the length of one entry by one character makes the difference between
compiling without ...
- Sat Apr 25, 2009 8:31 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: size-limit for aux, problem w/ hyperref, natbib, include
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6821
size-limit for aux, problem w/ hyperref, natbib, include
Is there a size limit to .aux files? My trouble started with a 150 page
set of class-notes when I "\include"d the last section. Eventually,
I found that by removing at least 10 labels I got the whole file to
compile correctly. Over some 10 hours I stripped almost everything
until just the ...
set of class-notes when I "\include"d the last section. Eventually,
I found that by removing at least 10 labels I got the whole file to
compile correctly. Over some 10 hours I stripped almost everything
until just the ...