LaTeX.org

shadgrind wrote: It seems like some internal objects weren't defined correctly by ghostscript when merging the PDFs.

I have submitted this problem as the Bug 692958 http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692958 at bugs.ghostscript.com.

Printed paper should be the reference, and also that has no arcs...

Sure, if the final result is a printed book and not an electronically published document.

Adobe Reader shows the arcs correctly.

The I wonder why your print doesn't show the arcs. Did you print with the Adobe Reader, or with ...

If one PDF viewer shows the arc and another one does not, it's obviously a viewer problem. Since Adobe developed PDF, their viewer should be the reference, while the TeXworks viewer could be considered as a previewer with less capabilities.

Printed paper should be the reference, and also that has ...

As I told in my example, Test-arcs.pdf does show the arcs if viewed with, e.g., Adobe Acrobat Reader. With the pdf (?) viewer in TeXWorks, the arcs do not show. After combining the two pdfs (Test-arcs.pdf and Doc1.pdf) with Ghostscript, the arcs do not show any more even with Acrobat. As far as I ...

Hi all,

Can you help me with this?

I am preparing a book with a figure containing arc-shaped arrows. Somehow these arcs get lost when running PDFLaTeX and seeing the result with TeXworks PDF viewer. Adobe Reader shows the arcs correctly. Why come?

When I add the preamble pages to my book (in PDF ...