LaTeX.org

I already realized that eqnarray shows a strange behavior, but i did not try to use "align". It's kind of dumb, I think, because I use "align*" all the time... damn
Thanks alot for the help and the hints!
Greetings,
Stefan

Hi community!

I want to change the tags of equations in such a way, that they display for example "(*)" instead of "(1.1)".
Currently I'm using the "\tag"-command provided by amsmath (or empheq or ntheorem, it's always the same) but there are several problems with that.

First, I get a warning ...

thank you, that works fine.

hi there!

i have some trouble with the ntheorem package (again).
i get the following error:

! No room for a new \count .
\ch@ck ...\else \errmessage {No room for a new #3}
\fi
l.1306 \newcount\MPnumerator
\MPnumerator = 1073741824 % 2^{30}


i have defined 26 different theorem-like ...

i found out how to fix it, kind of sick...
i already tried to call ntheorem with
\usepackage[framed, hyperref, thmmarks, amsmath, thref, empheq]{ntheorem}
causing latex to tell me that "empheq" is an unknown option, but to produce a different error...
what actually is working and what i did not ...

sorry, i did not mention that i already tried this...

hi community!

i'm currently trying to get empheq and ntheorem to work together, but somehow i cannot achieve it.
translating the following document

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[ngerman, english]{babel}
\usepackage{array, paralist ...

hi
thanks a lot, Stefan. It works, you made my day

okay, it works without the amsthm option. but this raises the next problem. i used amsthm for an proof-environment which displayed a small box at its end. apparently ntheorem can do this as well. in the documentation is said, that i have to use the package option "thmmarks". when i do so, i get the ...

i tried loading ntheorem with and after hyperref, but this did not help.
thanks anyway